Not exact matches
This is a much more of a «real - world» and
useful answer than any LMS calculus that can ever be
produced.
It's quite something to
answer the questions of a Parliamentary select committee and
produce something that is going to be
useful to beginners and all comers for years to come but that I think is what Nic has done for the sensitivity debate.
They simply think that science has utterly failed to
produce the correct
answer on everything from basic thermodynamics to analysis of temperature station data, that scientists chase research grant money by
producing answers useful for the expansion of government power, that every single mechanism intended to prevent corruption and fraud has failed and of course that scientists are individually and collectively involved in a conscious effort to lie to the public.
The application asks the user a series of simple questions and then
produces a bespoke, downloadable report providing only the most relevant and
useful information based on the user's
answers.
In some contexts, the
answer may be yes due to a core principle: tasks that are normally thought to require human intelligence can sometimes be automated through the use of non-intelligent computational techniques that employ heuristics, patterns, or proxies capable of
producing useful, «intelligent» results.