Sentences with phrase «produce valid results»

People and systems should be able to experiment at a level big enough to produce valid results but small enough that the consequences of failure are manageable.

The driver requested a second breath test which the officer allowed but after a couple of breath attempts that did not produce any valid results on the ASD the officer took the ASD machine away and served the driver with a Notice of Driving Prohibition based upon the first FAIL result.

This approach can not produce valid results no matter how much is spent on it, how often it is repeated, or how large the climate models they use.

Re M Tobis» musings on climate scientist's special insight / intuition that allows them to discern results denied to other people so the strictures of statistics do not apply to them in their climate work as their intuition allows them to produce valid results without following strict statistical procedures.

Thus the strictures of statistics do not apply to them in their climate work since their intuition allows them to produce valid results without following strict statistical procedures.

So they vary that one - dimensional input, and then the simulator can produce valid results.

It argues that they will not produce valid results showing what children can do and will be at risk of «gaming» — with schools lowering baseline scores to make it easier to show progress later on.

Both could produce valid results and still be weakly correlated with one another if they are testing different things.

Moreno believes that automatic speaker identification «is more than ready to produce valid results and improve the reliability of forensic evaluations.»

Not exact matches

Failure to produce a valid membership card could result removal from the stadium and action subsequently taken against the member whom ticket was assigned.

So while the SGPs were relatively «reliable,» meaning that they produced consistent results over time, there is no reason to believe that they are valid, meaning that they are actually measuring what they are said to measure.

CEA's voice on the council has resulted in a framework which is consistent with the goal of elevating the teaching profession by holding everyone accountable, while producing a new evaluation system that is fair, valid, reliable, and useful.

The assessments must be fully put into place and the results must first produce valid and reliable data before policymakers decide to extend their use for teacher and principal accountability measures, they note.1 In his research column this month, Bryan Goodwin also urges caution.

§ 40.160 What does the MRO do when a valid test result can not be produced and a negative result is required?

(a) If a valid test result can not be produced and a negative result is required, (under § 40.159 (a)(5)(iii) and (e)(4)-RRB-, as the MRO, you must determine if there is clinical evidence that the individual is currently an illicit drug user.

Thus I understand validation to be a demonstration that a process (method) of doing something or other is capable of producing proper results, i.e. given true inputs the valid process must produce true outputs.

It produces a mathematically valid result to the precision determined by where the gaussian is cropped when designing the filter.

They got results which were against the traditional scientific communities view on the matters and instead of re-evaluating and checking whether the traditional statistics were valid (which they weren't), they went on and produced another one a year later.

By «dropping» those outrider points the study infact removed the «source objects» of it's «research» and in reality only produced a «nice graph», NOT valid results.

To be valid RCP 8.5 would need to have some relevance in order to consider policy based on it's results, fudging models to produce results with parameters that have no bearing on the real physical world is pointless.

If the system is capable of exhibiting sufficient capacitance to produce the recent hiatus, there is no valid argument against why it could not also have produced the entire modern warming, unless that can be disproven with empirical data or I / O test results.

The City of Burnaby argued that the process followed by the NEB was unreasonable and did not produce a valid report in compliance with CEAA 2012 and the NEB Act, and, as a result, the Cabinet decision (which was based on the NEB's process) can not stand.

These results suggested that the items in the specially produced questionnaire were valid for investigating «factors related to smoking initiation in adolescence».

Results indicate that the proposed measure of conflict resolution produced valid factor analytic solutions, adequate internal consistency, and construct validity.