Not exact matches
Renewable energy: Commit to 100 percent renewable power The Climate Collaborative states that about one - third of all the greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come
from the
burning of fossil fuels such as
coal and natural gas to
produce electricity.
The sentence marked with an asterisk was changed
from «In fact, fly ash — a by - product
from burning coal for power — and other
coal waste contains up to 100 times more radiation than nuclear waste» to «In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power plant — a by - product
from burning coal for electricity — carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant
producing the same amount of energy.»
When atmospheric scientist Christine Wiedinmyer first went to Ghana in 2011 to investigate air pollution
produced by
burning different materials —
from crop stubble to
coal used in stoves — she noticed an unexpected potential source:
burning piles of trash.
Plants
produce VOCs when they decay, but a major source comes
from automobile exhaust,
coal burning, and other human activities.
Their intent, apparently, was to disparage the views of scientists who disagree with their contention that continued business - as - usual increases in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
produced from the
burning of
coal, gas, and oil will lead to a host of cataclysmic climate - related problems.
The good news: the U.S. is making a tectonic shift
from burning coal to
produce the majority of its electricity to using cleaner natural gas.
The USA is gradually switching
from coal to gas as low gas prices make it favourable to
burn, and it could make stronger use of particularly cheap gas since a great deal is
produced within the country, but political will at present is still focused on retaining the use of
coal.
After conducting what he described as «more rigorous» calculations, Gervasi concluded «that the total release of CO2
from producing Natuna gas and
burning of the LNG manufactured
from the gas would be almost twice that emitted by
burning an equivalent amount of
coal.»
Half the CO2
produced from fossil fuels
burned up til the mid-1970s, most of it the sour oil and
coal — and a slow cooling trend if anything.
The fact that
coal burning produces toxic emissions aside
from its global warming impact should be enough reason alone to make that switch.
And for those of you who want to insist that aerosols
produced by the uncontrolled
burning of
coal neutralized the effects of AGW
from 1940 to 1979, please explain how the same argument could not be made for the effects of
coal - induced aerosols during this earlier period, when no constraints on the polluting effects of
coal combustion were present at all.
What you have here is Senators
from states that have lost a lot of manufacturing jobs — that have been sent abroad or that have been very hard hit by the state of the economy — or they're
coal -
producing states, or states that
burn a lot of
coal — so they have these domestic economic and political concerns that they have to answer to their voters on.
The graph
produced from its measurements, known as the Keeling Curve, was the first to show the tight relationship between the increase in CO2 in the air and the rise in the
burning of fossil fuels like
coal, oil and natural gas.
Higher density sources of fuel such as
coal and natural gas utilized in centrally -
produced power stations actually improve the environmental footprint of the poorest nations while at the same time lifting people
from the scourge of poverty... Developing countries in Asia already
burn more than twice the
coal that North America does, and that discrepancy will continue to expand... So, downward adjustments to North American
coal use will have virtually no effect on global CO2 emissions (or the climate), no matter how sensitive one thinks the climate system might be to the extra CO2 we are putting back into the atmosphere.
The slight downward trend in temperature
from about 1945 until about 1975 is due to the increase in Sulfate Aerosols (SO4), largely
produced by
burning coal that contains sulfur.
The carbon dioxide they
produce will equal about an eighth of China's current total carbon dioxide emissions, which come mostly
from coal -
burning power plants and factories.
No, the Social Benefits of Carbon» claiming the government is vastly underestimating the social benefits of
coal as well as the benefits
from the carbon dioxide pollution
produced by
burning that
coal, including enhancing photosynthesis and agricultural productivity.
In the longer - term the CO2
produced from the
burning of
coal produces a warming effect.
After conducting what he described as «more rigorous» calculations, Gervasi concluded «that the total release of CO2
from producing Natuna gas and
burning of the LNG manufactured
from the gas would be almost twice that emitted by
burning an equivalent amount of
coal.»
Coal -
burning power plants, for example,
produce millions of tons of toxic sludge every year, and we're stilling reeling
from the impacts of the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon spill that rocked the Gulf of Mexico.
Around half of our grid - based electricity could be supplied by means of a few very large power systems
burning methane, either in the form of natural gas or the effluvium
from underground
coal gasification [the only way to employ
coal cleanly, he argues], and burying the carbon dioxide they
produce.
And according to Emanuel, these newer models have a different treatment of so - called sulfate aerosol emissions, which come
from the
burning of
coal and actually tend to reflect sunlight away
from the planet and its oceans,
producing a net cooling effect.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies have been marketed as a way to address climate emissions
from burning coal, by pumping CO2
produced through
burning coal underground isntead of into the air.
Victor @ 308, you also need to consider asia is
burning significant
coal since the 1980s with a certain level of CO2
produced as well as SO2, but asia is also getting other countries CO2
from a period of many decades before and after 1980s, as CO2 mixes globally.