Sentences with phrase «produced known temperature»

Statistical models take the parameters of the past that produced known temperature trends and then developed probability outcomes, were these parameters to show up again.

Not exact matches

What the team didn't know at the time was that making titanium -3-gold at relatively high temperature produces an almost pure crystalline form of the beta version of the alloy — the crystal structure that's four times harder than titanium.

Los Alamos National Laboratory has produced the first known material capable of single - photon emission at room temperature and at telecommunications wavelengths.

Los Alamos National Laboratory researchers have produced the first known material capable of single - photon emission at room temperature and at telecommunications wavelengths, using chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes.

We also know that photons passing through dark energy allow for the kind of energy changes that produce varying temperatures that are in turn represented in the CMB map.

A general time - independent statement would only be reasonable if you are comparing the largest possible influence on temperature, i.e. the largest possible temperature change a factor can produce, and these are neither known nor discussed to my knowledge (even then, it would be timescale dependant).

Since we know the Gal4 - UAS system is sensitive to temperature and in fact, expression levels of these transgenes differ at 22 °C and 25 °C, Drosophila GBPs might also suppress ILP secretion from the insulin - producing cells when expressed at high concentrations.

LOS ALAMOS, N.M., July 31, 2017 — Los Alamos National Laboratory has produced the first known material capable of single - photon emission at room temperature and at telecommunications wavelengths.

While Organic Valley is no doubt the worst offender of this regulatory loophole, any other cheese sold in stores, produced in the United States and labeled as «raw» is also likely heated to subpasteurization temperatures.

You just convinced me that I shouldn't bake or fry anything (unless you know the exact temperatures harmful compounds are being produced at) and that eating raw or steaming is the best way to go.

Artificial trans fatty acids are produced by adding hydrogen — a process known as partial hydrogenation — to liquid oils; this makes them solid at room temperature, more stable during repeated deep - frying and extends their shelf time [19].

How does society, as it stands now, not understand that they have locked into the system already a rise to the high 500's ppm, and, in my humble opinion, the low 600's are NOT out of the question.To me this is just as much of a tragedy if it takes place 250 years from now as it is if it takes only 100 years.In the end, the seventh generation is screwed by a huge loss of fresh water, a huge increase in temperature, an ocean that no longer produces even one tenth of its total protein and carboydrate output as it did in the 1800's.

No matter what other factors affect temperature, the addition of large amounts of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere - ocean system will produce large negative effects.

«We've known for a long - time that the animal neurotransmitter GABA (gamma - aminobutyric acid) is produced by plants under stress, for example when they encounter drought, salinity, viruses, acidic soils or extreme temperatures,» says Gilliham.

Monckton: 185: Would it not have been fairer if you had admitted that you simply have no idea how the IPCC actually calculates its temperature projections, and that — as will be evident from the above questions — I know enough about it to produce accurate and reliable graphs?

A general time - independent statement would only be reasonable if you are comparing the largest possible influence on temperature, i.e. the largest possible temperature change a factor can produce, and these are neither known nor discussed to my knowledge (even then, it would be timescale dependant).

«We also present a set of global vulnerability drivers that are known with high confidence: (1) droughts eventually occur everywhere; (2) warming produces hotter droughts; (3) atmospheric moisture demand increases nonlinearly with temperature during drought; (4) mortality can occur faster in hotter drought, consistent with fundamental physiology; (5) shorter droughts occur more frequently than longer droughts and can become lethal under warming, increasing the frequency of lethal drought nonlinearly; and (6) mortality happens rapidly relative to growth intervals needed for forest recovery.

Still, I suppose it it useful to know the «mean» PDSI produced by the two means of rainfall and temperature.

Model outputs do produce specific year - to - year fluctuations — fluctuations that are not hindcasted well (that's the weather, after all)-- but nobody's interested in knowing the exact temperature of any particular year.

There are no known metrics derived from trees that can be cranked through a biophysical theory to produce a growth temperature.

The mechanism that produces this difference between the actual surface temperature and the effective temperature is due to the atmosphere and is known as the greenhouse effect.»

Importantly, the changes in cereal yield projected for the 2020s and 2080s are driven by GHG - induced climate change and likely do not fully capture interannual precipitation variability which can result in large yield reductions during dry periods, as the IPCC (Christensen et al., 2007) states: ``... there is less confidence in the ability of the AOGCMs (atmosphere - ocean general circulation models) to generate interannual variability in the SSTs (sea surface temperatures) of the type known to affect African rainfall, as evidenced by the fact that very few AOGCMs produce droughts comparable in magnitude to the Sahel droughts of the 1970s and 1980s.»

The remainder of «life» indicates that due to evidenced bio-forms there could not have been any intensity within supposed «greenhouse radiation'that could have produced an induction of KE within the surface to produce the needed temperature, and still allowed for the production of «life» as «we are» and «as we know it».

The (microwave) energy within the Infrared Region (IrR) will not produce «sun burn» (a mild radiation burn from UV - A and UV - B) but would induct too much intrinsic KE (measured as temperature) in outer cellular structures, stopping internal cellular processes, killing those cells, and preventing even the formation of «life» not only «as we know it», but as «we are».

You are wilfully taking the extreme and irrelevant sub-thermodynamic case of a minuscule total number of isolated particles — in which regime the macroscopic temperature is increasingly ill - defined and no longer simply proportional to the kinetic energy per particle — and torturing it to produce something that looks a bit like a macroscopic lapse rate, but is really nothing more than a mathematical artefact of absolutely no significance.

No, he said, and that was why he had taken care to anonymize the data and send them to a statistician, who had confirmed the obvious: since the same technique, applied to the same data, could produce precisely opposite results depending upon a careful choice of the endpoints for the multiple trend - lines that the IPCC's bureaucrats had superimposed on the perfectly correct graph of 150 years of temperature changes that the scientists had submitted, the technique must be defective and any results obtained by its use must be meaningless.

All we know is that there are factors which affect temperature, and which have produced the observed results.

«If numbers could be generated for how many deaths per year were caused by each degree rise in global temperature, for instance, a similar case could be made against a particular company that produced or emitted a known percentage of the carbon load contributing to global warming.»

What is profound is showing — if it proves to be the case — that natural cycles with very modest parameters (the cycles shown in the link have amplitudes that could be explained by known variation in TSI), when subjected to random shocks of an order demonstrated in nature, can produce centennial (or longer) changes in global temperature on the order actually observed.

When I asked a prof of volcanology whether undersea volcanoes might produce a noticeable and sudden increase in the temperature of the Arctic Ocean (which was her specialty) she said «NO».

Stations that are known to be poorly sited, and which produce temperature readings that are too high, were adjusted even higher.

Again, none of the different parameter sets producing these simulated temperatures is known to be any more physically correct than any other set.

All they can say is — e.g., despite the hiatus / lull / plateau / stutter / lolling / dangling — the average global temperature will never actually crater because... humans produce CO2, tra - la... and, we'll be saying the same thing ten years from now no matter what natures brings our way because, we're professionals.

In «fact» the only evidence that emissions produced by human industry have any measurable effect on the «Temperature of the Earth» is that it is proclaimed loudly and often that it is an unchallenged and unchallengeable fact and every effort is made do demonize and / or ridicule and / or prosecute as a criminal anyone who dares to question, no matter how mildly, that it is in fact a «fact».

Cosmic rays don't have any correlation with temperature anyway, so it's just a waste of time, except I'm always for a little egghead welfare, you never know, the cosmec ray climate hypothesis might accidently produce some interesting science.

There is not actual any observed «greenhouse temperature amplification process», there is little valid data that can be produced, and the models mentioned are nothing more than a produced belief system that has material quantities plugged in with no regard to use of the known properties of the materials involved.

Electrons jumping orbitals and producing radiation don't know if there is a warmer or colder body out there somewhere, therefore the total instantaneous radiation from any body is independent of the temperature of the surroundings.

A simple numerical model using known sunspots and known PDO changes and a 22 year lag time produces the observed temperature trends since 1900.

As you may know, cold - pressed oils are not produced via heating to high temperatures; heating the ground paste up will produce more oil but alter the oil's nutritional value and taste, so oftentimes foodies will swear by cold - pressed oils — even better if it's made by the wind!

So it is that by NOT knowing the H2O content of these «bubbles» there is no manner of knowing WHAT the «temperature» being produced within the atmosphere BY the atmosphere is, in any valid manner.

Edward Wegman is a statistician at George Mason University known for producing a report disputing paleoclimate data and models concerning the «hockey stick» temperature graph relating to climate change.

So it seems quite clear that there is a potential connection, in a statistical sense, between human - caused global warming, declining Arctic sea ice, and the anomalous blocking pattern this winter that has added to other factors we know are tied to human - caused climate change (warmer temperatures and increased soil evaporation, and decreased winter snowpack and freshwater runoff) to produce the unprecedented drought this year in California.

A car parked in direct sunlight, with the windows all the way up, can reach up to 170 degrees in only 15 minutes causing the temperature on a child or pet to rise above 105 degrees, causing a heat stroke because their little bodies can no longer produce sweat.