Sentences with phrase «produces a hockey stick when»

What skeptic has defended hiding the decline or the Artificial Hockey Stick (produces a hockey stick when the data is red noise) or a conspiracy to delete emails?

Not exact matches

ThinkingScientist said: «When tested with stationary (no trend) noise the algorithm still produces a hockey stick.»

When tested with stationary (no trend) noise the algorithm still produces a hockey stick.

There is little that can be validly noticed from the «hockey stick» plot, the methodology to produce it was flawed, showing clear indications of predetermination in it's consideration of «data» dropping «outrider points» when those very points are strongly indicative of short term fluctuations of temperature in an «experiment» looking for «the casual process» only shows that the «casual process» had already been decided on beforehand.

Do click through to look at the various «replications» and «confirmations» of Mann's hockey stick, and note the differences between Mann's own sticks and what he produces «when he has to work with competent scientists who can check his work» (see the «consensus» hockey stick above).

You also claim that McI and McK were correct when they showed that Mann's statistical method produces hockey stick shapes from trendless red noise but then you write «they would have a valid point in principle, but the critique would not matter in the case of the hockey - stick.»

McIntyre and McKitrick claimed that the «short - centred» method, when applied to so - called «persistent red noise», nearly always produces a hockey stick shaped first principal component (PC1).

And it was just one in a long series of threats I've received since the late 1990s, when my research illustrated the unprecedented nature of global warming, producing an upward - trending temperature curve whose shape has been likened to a hockey stick.