They expected that rising temperatures would
produce more water vapor, leading to more snowfall and more ice.
(And I still can't see how a newly open and increasingly warm summer Arctic Ocean won't
produce more water vapor, vapor whose GHG properties will further accelerate Arctic warming — or is that completely offset by increased cloud formation??)
Not exact matches
However, the surface warming caused by human -
produced increases in carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases leads to a large increase in
water vapor, since a warmer atmosphere holds
more moisture.
Water vapor is absorbed to produce hydrogen, but then the burning of hydrogen produces water vapor, which can then be absorbed by the system and produce more hydr
Water vapor is absorbed to
produce hydrogen, but then the burning of hydrogen
produces water vapor, which can then be absorbed by the system and produce more hydr
water vapor, which can then be absorbed by the system and
produce more hydrogen.
The lack of»
water vapor» is, because: it was
more water in Arctic ocean without ice cover as» insulation» - >
water absorbed extra coldness and the currents brought extra coldness in North Atlantic = above the ocean is colder = less evaporation - > less
water vapor produced - > less moisture going west from central Atlantic.
However, the surface warming caused by human -
produced increases in carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases leads to a large increase in
water vapor, since a warmer atmosphere holds
more moisture.
The world's climate is way too complex... with way too many significant global and regional variables (e.g., solar, volcanic and geologic activity, variations in the strength and path of the jet stream and major ocean currents, the seasons created by the tilt of the earth, and the concentration of
water vapor in the atmosphere, which by the way is many times
more effective at holding heat near the surface of the earth than is carbon dioxide, a non-toxic, trace gas that all plant life must have to survive, and that
produce the oxygen that WE need to survive) to consider for any so - called climate model to generate a reliable and reproducible predictive model.
The car only
produced water vapor from the exhuast and had
more power.
The fact remains that there is 4 percent
more water vapor — and associated additional moist energy — available both to power individual storms and to
produce intense rainfall from them.
5) Human activities, e.g. any process to
produce energy or cooling causes
more greenhouse gases:
water vapor and carbon dioxide which trap long wave energy leaving earth.
1) Decrease in earth's albedo 2) Decrease in evaporation (i.e negative factors affecting evaporation) 3) Volcanic activities on earth, e.g. hot lava & hot
waters 4) Human activities (AHF), creating heat to move or to stay warm or cold 5) Human activities, e.g. any process to
produce energy or cooling causes
more greenhouse gases:
water vapor and carbon dioxide which trap long wave energy leaving earth.
... And with a general increase in SSTs, I expect certain kinds of low - frequency variability, in particular those in which SST anomalies
produce a perturbation wave train in the westerlies allowing for global teleconnections, to be
more sensitive to the same SST anomalies, because of the exponential temperature dependence of
water vapor concentration (involved in latent heating, enhances deep convection, etc.).
It is also because there is much
more water vapor in the atmosphere than CO2 and, since the amount of climate forcing goes approximately logarithmically with concentration that means the concentration of
water vapor has to change by a significantly larger ABSOLUTE amount to
produce the same effect.
Doesn't that then mean that there are no
more photons to be absorbed by the added
water vapor produced as a result of the added heat from the CO2 associated warming?
At any given moment, clouds now cover at least half the area of the planet, and increased warming should
produce even
more clouds along with increasing
water vapor.
«Warmer air can contain
more water vapor than cooler air,» according to the 2014 Climate Assessment
produced by the U.S. government.
That is, if warming, say due to increased CO2,
produces more evaporation and therefore
more water vapor and thus
more clouds, that will feed back and reduce the amount of warming somewhat.