Sentences with phrase «producing hockey sticks from»

Third, it used the exploratory technique of principal components analysis combined with a obscure weighting formula, producing hockey sticks from random data.

The NAS said» Mann et al. used a type of principal component analysis that tends to bias the shape of the reconstructions», i.e. produce hockey sticks from baseball statistics, telephone book numbers, and monte carlo random numbers.

Mann's calculations produces hockey sticks from white noise, toilets, and any other assemblage of numbers, so anyone who would place an iota trust in such obvious nonsense can hardly be regarded as a scientist instead of a false propagandist.

Not exact matches

The more meaningful statistical question, however is this one: Given the «null hypothesis» of red noise with the same statistical attributes (i.e., variance and lag - one autocorrelation coefficients) as the actual North American ITRDB series, and applying the MBH98 (non-centered) PCA convention, how likely is one to produce the «Hockey Stick» pattern from chance alone.

There is little that can be validly noticed from the «hockey stick» plot, the methodology to produce it was flawed, showing clear indications of predetermination in it's consideration of «data» dropping «outrider points» when those very points are strongly indicative of short term fluctuations of temperature in an «experiment» looking for «the casual process» only shows that the «casual process» had already been decided on beforehand.

You also claim that McI and McK were correct when they showed that Mann's statistical method produces hockey stick shapes from trendless red noise but then you write «they would have a valid point in principle, but the critique would not matter in the case of the hockey - stick.»

Readers of CE should be familiar with this concept in the context of Mann, as it is exactly one of the favorite attacks on the Hockey Stick to produce hockey stick lines from Hockey Stick to produce hockey stick lines from nStick to produce hockey stick lines from hockey stick lines from nstick lines from noise.

It is the erroneous interpretation of what IS Kinetic Energy that still «dogs greenhouse rhetoric» and makes concentration on, and opinionation involving of, Temperature (including the «hockey stick») poorly correlated on «climate alteration» as these generally involving of «greenhouse warming» do NOT notice the lag produced from Turbulent Cooling in its reversion actually releasing «stored» Kinetic Energy.

And to top it all, Wegman et al flatly stated that the biasing Mann et al algorithm would produce «hockey stick» reconstructions from low - order, low - autocorrelation red noise, while displaying a set of curves from the top 1 % of «hockey sticks» produced from high - persistence random proxies.

It is conclusive that the claims about the ability to produce a «hockey stick» from noise were «aided» by cherry picking From the link about the Wegman report: --------from noise were «aided» by cherry picking From the link about the Wegman report: --------From the link about the Wegman report: ------------

The so called «spaghetti» graphs used in figure 2 above are interesting, but their range of variability (excepting Moberg et al) remain almost as limited as their iconic predecessor the «Hockey stick» produced by Dr Michael Mann et al and from which the IPCC third assessment report graphic from 2001 was derived.

It was clear that the Yamal data differed from Hantemirov and Shiyatov because it produced totally wrong results because the Hantemirov and Shiyatov data had no hockey stick shape.