They may, however, have graphics for easy identification of
the product as a breastmilk substitute and for illustrating methods of preparation.»
Not exact matches
The International Code of Marketing
Breastmilk Substitutes (known in lactivist circles
as the «WHO Code»), prohibits formula companies from advertising in any conspicuous way: «There should be no advertising or other form of promotion to the general public of
products within the scope of this Code,» proclaims article 5.1 of this policy, coauthored in 1981 by UNICEF and the World Health Organization (WHO).
This includes prohibiting nutrition and health claims that are designed to project artificial feeding
products as similar to
breastmilk.
Breastmilk substitutes are a necessary
product in certain circumstances, although follow - on formulas have been described by the World Health Assembly
as not necessary and so - called growing up milks have been invented to part parents from their cash — pure and simple.
In Papua New Guinea, the sale of feeding bottles, cups, teats and dummies is strictly controlled, and there is a ban on advertising these
products as well
as breastmilk substitutes.
In addition, where follow - up formula is otherwise represented in a manner which results in such
product being perceived or used
as a partial or total replacement for
breastmilk, such
product also falls within the scope of the Code.»
This leads to confusion
as to the purpose of the
product, i.e. a perception that follow - up formula is a
breastmilk substitute.»
Note, the other
breastmilk substitutes they promote, such
as follow - on formula and so - called growing - up milks, are unnecessary
products according to the World Health Organisation and rip parents off.
Simply placing warnings on the
products that they are not to be used
as breastmilk substitutes is not enough,
as 39 % of Laotian women are unable to read.
INFACT Canada has received reports that Bear Brand
products are widely mistaken
as breastmilk substitutes.
While
breastmilk substitutes may not be impulse purchases in the same way
as chocolate or alcohol, they are high - margin
products.
This particular
product is utterly nutritionally inadequate
as a
breastmilk substitute, yet depicts a mother and baby bear in the breastfeeding pose on its label.
But it is not only the convenience that it boasts;
as another
product of my best pick, Enfamil Premium is also made
as closest to
breastmilk as possible.
A baby with food intolerance reacts to food chemicals coming through the
breastmilk from his mother's diet.3 These include food additives and natural food chemicals found in everyday healthy foods — usually the substances in foods that give them flavour —
as well
as potentially in some staple foods, such
as dairy
products, soy and some grains.
Aware that today, five years after the adoption of the International Code, many Member States have made substantial efforts to implement it, but that many
products unsuitable for infant feeding are nonetheless being promoted and used for this purpose; and that sustained and concerted efforts will therefore continue to be necessary to achieve full implementation of and compliance with the International Code
as well
as the cessation of the marketing of unsuitable
products and the improper promotion of
breastmilk substitutes;
Formula companies have long advertised their
products as «closer than ever to
breastmilk,» but they are still a far cry from the real thing, which is why we need to be alert
as consumers to advertising that does anything to equate the two.
Infant formula makers have always marketed their
products with messages that suggest that their
products are nearly
as good
as breastmilk and some even giving the impression their formulas are better than
breastmilk.
In response to a request from Mr Taylor, the World Health Organisation provided evidence on the importance of reducing added sugars and also on marketing, explaining that all
products that function
as breastmilk substitutes, including any milk
products (liquid or powdered) that are marketed for young children (including follow - up formula and growing - up milks) are covered by the International Code.
WHO explains that WHA Resolutions «clearly cover all
products that function
as breastmilk substitutes.
Though there are ways to do so safely like drinking the beverage while you are nursing so the alcohol levels are sure to drop (so long
as you only have a small dose,) by the time you are ready for the next feeding, and if you really want to be safe you can check out Milkscreen, a
product designed to test the alcohol content of
breastmilk.
The International Code of Marketing of
Breastmilk Substitutes and subsequent, relevant WHA Resolutions aim to ensure that these
products are
as safe
as possible and marketed responsibly.
(Feed Yourself, Feed Your Family, 2012) Mothers who consume no animal
products, those who have nutrient absorption issues due to Crohn's disease or gastric by - pass surgery, or who have diets limited by other disorders or choices, should discuss vitamin supplementation, particularly vitamin B12, with a knowledgeable health professional for the sake of their own body and health
as well
as to ensure that their bodies have adequate stores to draw on when producing
breastmilk.
As the world celebrates World Environment Day on June 5, WABA would like to remind everyone about the ecological benefits of breastfeeding and that the practice of bottle feeding including the production of
breastmilk substitutes and baby foods are non - renewable
products that create ecological damage at every stage of their production, distribution and use.