tactical political reasons (progressive atheists aren't likely to vote for a Republican even if he's an atheist so no votes to be picked up there; a far smaller # of people who are conservative atheists similarly wouldn't require politician to be atheist to vote for him in the first place; and non-atheists wouldn't be more likely to vote for an atheist over
his professed lack of belief and may be more likely to NOT vote for the person if they are deeply religious).
Not exact matches
They quietly
profess their
belief or
lack thereof and are not critical
of how others choose to
belief and don't push their feelings on others.
It would seem the problem is not a
lack of knowledge
of the contents
of the Bible but a
lack of belief in those words or, more accurately, a
belief in the Person that they describe and
profess.
While it is impossible to prove a negative, the complete
lack of empirical evidence to support
belief in any God and the self -
professed reliance on
belief (faith) rather than knowledge combined with a rigid and irrational unwillingness to apply basic logic with regards to these particular
beliefs strongly suggests that God does not exist.
In voice - over narration, Charlie unconvincingly
professes his
belief in the «perfect crime,» but also confesses his fatal
lack of personal character.