Not exact matches
As a
professional scientist, a physicist with 40 years experience in aerospace and extensive knowledge of
atmospheric physics, I can tell you that, indeed, the science is settled, but not the way the AGW extremists would have you believe.
The above comment from Kitcher («the
atmospheric scientists was not wrong to withhold the information from the public») is a powerful illustration of social
scientists falling into the trap of motivated reasoning, justifying the questionable
professional standards through recourse to alleged higher ethical standards.
Yet «Then There's Physics» is in here telling champion programmers and
professional applied
atmospheric chemistry
scientists, that — they really need to go back and make sure where they are coming from is actually scientifically competent.
In a letter to Grijalva released this afternoon, the American Meteorological Society (AMS)-- a scientific and
professional society representing
atmospheric and oceanic
scientists — expressed strong opposition to the inquiry.
20 years ago, the AMS was the main
professional society for
atmospheric scientists: NOAA, university, and private sector with the majority of members from NOAA.
The American Meteorological Society is the nation's leading
professional society for
scientists in the
atmospheric, oceanic, and related sciences.