An email exchange between a student and his professor go viral and
the professor has some opinions on it that he shared via Twitter.
Not exact matches
Freedom to speak,
on campusAt CEIBS, a non-profit joint venture between the Chinese government commerce department and the European Commission,
professors and students
have the liberty to speak their
opinions in the classroom, says the marketing department's Chason.
University of Ottawa
professor Michael Geist
had a post the other day
on the CRTC's new Talk TV consultation, a process designed to solicit Canadians»
opinions on how television services are delivered and sold.
Noble Prize - winning economist and Columbia
Professor Joesph Stiglitz
has long presented his controversial
opinions on what he sees as the shortcomings and dangers of Bitcoin.
Not all were convinced by Charles Reich and Clyde Summers, two law school
professors who expressed the
opinion that
on their side the resisters
had not only their consciences but the United States Constitution.
When Rusty notes that people
on the right today
have little respect for the
opinions of Ivy League
professors, this is generally the reason.
I am aware of just how much influence a
professor's
opinion on different matters might
have on his / her students.
Haluk Gerger, a former assistant
professor at the University of Ankara, a well - known intellectual, and a respected writer
on nuclear weapons strategy,
has been repeatedly imprisoned for the peaceful expression of his
opinion.
In school, it is a common assignment that
professors ask their students to accomplish which is a kind of mind - puzzling exercise enabling students in writing a reaction paper that will let them give a reaction or
opinion on what they
have read or saw.
People
have different
opinions on programs or techniques and we need rigorous science to step in and help us dissect what is really going
on,» said Erica Feuerbacher, Ph.
D., BCBA -
D, CPDT - KA, assistant
professor of anthrozoology at Carroll College.
Columbia University
Professor Wally Broecker
has recently published a thoughtful
opinion piece (open access)
on the judiciousness and potential of air capture geoengineering in the new journal Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.
Money
has no role in influencing the
opinion or studies of university
professors when they are
on the right side of an issue, it only helps to tell the story of the issue.
capt. D., I
would not call people like
Professor Richard Alley ignorant, so I tend to go with their
opinions on paleoclimate as opposed to people like you and kim who give a good impression of making things up as you go along.
professor's controversial views
on global warming could be mistaken for the state's views... The governor's office
has repeatedly said that Michaels does not represent the state with his
opinions about global warming.»
To say that everyone can
have an
opinion, and to set up a controversial «debate»
on these questions is the «false balance»
Professor Jones identified in the report he did for the BBC.
Professor Daniel Solove has his annual report on the state of law professor blogging in this post at Concurring
Professor Daniel Solove
has his annual report
on the state of law
professor blogging in this post at Concurring
professor blogging in this post at Concurring
Opinions.
While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before
professors and submitted occasional written disputations
on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns
had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases
would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the
professor in charge that week
would issue a written
opinion.124
A first - year law student who
has never
had the opportunity to disagree with a
professor or to independently form
opinions about cultures based
on their art, literature, or music will almost certainly struggle to synthesize seemingly inconsistent judicial
opinions into a cogent legal principle.
Professor White suggests that it does matter how
opinions are written because they
have important consequences for the parties in a particular case and for the future.29 He further argues that a crucial part of legal activity is the criticism of
opinions on rational, political, and moral grounds because that is how relevant arguments are made in support of changing or retaining current rules of law.30 For him, the bigger question «is whether law will move in the direction of trivializing human experience, and itself, or in the direction of dignifying itself and that experience.»
Professor Roark also writes for various national law blogs,
having appeared
on Concurring
Opinions, The Faculty Lounge, Property Prof Blog and Commercial Law Blog, amongst others.
Shortly thereafter, the UK Government announced that it
would publish a legal
opinion prepared by two eminent international lawyers,
Professor James Crawford and
Professor Alan Boyle of the Universities of Cambridge and Edinburgh respectively,
on the legal aspects arising from Scottish independence.
Though appointed judges write higher - quality
opinions, according to the study, elected judges write many more, and thus, the
professors attributed the difference in quality to volume (I
would also argue that very generally, federal practice attracts more complex cases and a slightly higher quality of lawyer, which also contributes to the quality of the decision since in many cases, a judicial decision is only as good as the briefs
on which it is based).
Once again, the debate
on whether law
professors should ban laptops in class, which I discussed here a year ago,
has returned to the blogosphere, precipitated by this
opinion piece in the Washington Post by Georgetown law
professor David Cole.
Following the death of 86 year old Sarlotta Rotsztein who died
on September 29th 2014 at the Royal Free Hospital, her relatives sought an ex - parte injunction to prevent a full post mortem after Mary Hassell, the Inner London Coroner refused a body scan for which they were willing to pay.Her decision was taken against a background of differing medical
opinions on the cause of death.Mr Justice Leggatt
had granted an injunction prohibiting an invasive post mortem until attempts were made to determine the cause of death by a non or minimally invasive post mortem - and a CT scan was performed at the John Radcliffe Hospital, where
Professor Roberts, in his
opinion, identified a clear cause of death.
«Those who try to paint Alito as hostile to women's interests for this are either distorting his record or misunderstanding the law,» blogs UW
professor Ann Althouse, who
on Monday blogged this rave review of Alito's
opinion on whether Congress
has the power under the 14th Amendment to enact the Family Medical Leave Act (Chittister v. Department of community and Economic Development).
In addition to his scholarly writing,
Professor Lubet's humor and
opinion pieces
have appeared frequently
on the op - ed pages of newspapers such as the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Baltimore Sun, Philadelphia Inquirer, Newsday, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Dallas Morning News, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Detroit Free Press, and many others, as well as in the online journals Slate and Salon.
All in all, it can be quite hard to find a learned and practical
opinion, but Daniele Bianchi, an assistant
professor of Finance of Warwick Business School,
has given his thoughts
on the recent rally and why it
has happened.
Noble Prize - winning economist and Columbia
Professor Joesph Stiglitz
has long presented his controversial
opinions on what he sees as the shortcomings and dangers of Bitcoin.