After all, I had been assured by some of my colleagues that neither side wants
professors on a jury.
Not exact matches
(In fact two other
professors on the earlier civil - suit panel with me had been chosen for that
jury.
Nine Iranians working
on behalf of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps hacked the computers of 7998
professors at 320 universities around the world over the past 5 years, an indictment filed by a federal grand
jury alleges.
As for the research
on competitive effects of school choice policies in general — vouchers, tax - credit scholarships, and charters all together — the
jury is still out, said David Arsen, a
professor of education policy and K - 12 educational administration at Michigan State University.
The shortlist for the Prize, announced
on July 27, 2016, was selected by an international
jury that included Kitty Scott, the AGO's Carol and Morton Rapp Curator of Modern and Contemporary Art; Russell Ferguson,
Professor in the Department of Art at the University of California; and Stan Douglas, acclaimed artist and filmmaker.
Professor Sydney Hurtwitz, formerly Dean of Boston University CFA, in awarding Ival first prize in drawing at the South Shore Art Center
Juried Exhibition in Scituate, Massachusetts, commented
on the strength and power of her drawings.
The
jury's still out
on that question, but as this recent post by Orin Kerr at Volokh shows, blogging can get even a law
professor accused of copyright violations and hypocrisy.
Thaddeus Hoffmeister, a law
professor who also blogs about
juries, told the Post that, for young people in particular, «digital activity» such as looking up words or finding information
on Wikipedia is as normal as breathing.
As a law student, my trial practice
professor spent all of one class
on jury selection.
To further fuel this ranking frenzy, Joe Hodnicki at Law Librarian Blog took this latest Leiter ranking of law
professor placements, added in Leiter's earlier ranking of law faculties based
on scholarly impact, and then lined it all up against the U.S. News & World Report 2008 rankings of the best law schools, to produce this chart: A
Jury of One's Peers: Ranking Law School Reputations.
Three academic researchers tackle open justice issues in the final section:
Professor Ian Cram looks at the effect of Twitter
on juries; Dr Lawrence McNamara considers how the judiciary contributes to legal reform through «extra - judicial» statements; andLucy Series examines secrecy in the Court of Protection.
Professor Coyle also reminded the
jury — who had sat through months of evidence
on technical, administrative, and bureaucratic details — that the real issue at hand was the life and tragic death of a frightened young woman, human and vulnerable.»
Professor Marder, who clerked for U.S. Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens, teaches courses
on civil procedure and
on juries, judges and trials.
The article focuses
on former Memorial University
Professor, Ranjit Chandra's appeal of a
jury decision which found CBC journalists who created a television series questioning his scientific integrity did not commit a breach of privacy.
Jury Statute Not Violated by Protester, Judge Rules A federal judge on Thursday ordered the dismissal of an indictment against the professor, Julian P. Heicklen, who had been charged with jury tampering for advocating the controversial position known as jury nullification while outside the courtho
Jury Statute Not Violated by Protester, Judge Rules A federal judge
on Thursday ordered the dismissal of an indictment against the
professor, Julian P. Heicklen, who had been charged with
jury tampering for advocating the controversial position known as jury nullification while outside the courtho
jury tampering for advocating the controversial position known as
jury nullification while outside the courtho
jury nullification while outside the courthouse.
2 For an extensive list of studies demonstrating the competence of
juries, see, e.g., Testimony of Neil Vidmar, Russell M. Robinson, II
Professor of Law, Duke Law School before The Senate Committee
on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, «Hearing
on Medical Liability: New Ideas for Making the System Work Better for Patients,» June 22, 2006 at 10 («The overwhelming number of the judges gave the civil
jury high marks for competence, diligence, and seriousness, even in complex cases... Systematic studies of
jury responses to experts lead to the conclusion that jurors do not automatically defer to experts and that jurors have a basic understanding of the evidence in malpractice and other cases.
Professor Paul Butler does a great job discussing the power of jurors conscientiously to say Not Guilty, even if the law was technically broken, in this NPR interview spurred by the billboards placed in Washington, D.C.
Jury Nullification: Acquitting Based on Principle In response to former prosecutor Jeffrey Cramer's argument against jury nullification, Butler says: -LSB-
Jury Nullification: Acquitting Based
on Principle In response to former prosecutor Jeffrey Cramer's argument against
jury nullification, Butler says: -LSB-
jury nullification, Butler says: -LSB-...]