Not exact matches
While some charter schools use related - party transactions
to achieve
cost savings in the best interest of their students, in most cases they are used
to produce questionable salaries and
profits for the charter holders,
at the expense of students and
taxpayers.»
Samsung gets
to keep the
profits provided by Ontario
Taxpayers (Green Energy does NOT, can not make money, so the
profits are provided), AND Ontario sells off Green generated power
at less than the
cost of production
to jurisdictions outside of Ontario and Canada.
He wrapped it in promises of green jobs,
profits from industry creating renewable clean energy, a stop
to «bubble or bust» economic cycles, and all
at no
cost to the
taxpayers because «polluters» pay the bill.
And remember not only that this would contain just 20 percent of today's CO2 emissions but also this crucial difference: The oil industry has invested in its enormous infrastructure in order
to make a
profit,
to sell its product on an energy - hungry market (
at around $ 100 per barrel and 7.2 barrels per tonne that comes
to about $ 700 per tonne)-- but (one way or another) the
taxpayers of rich countries would have
to pay for huge capital
costs and significant operating burdens of any massive CCS.
These state - mandated requirements: * impose added
costs on consumers, and * generate a net economic loss
to states that results when out of state wind energy developers capitalize on and
profit from the stateís requirements
at the expense of their own
taxpayers.