In an invaluable new analysis, John Bailey of Whiteboard Advisors — and veteran of the White House, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of Commerce — examines how the federal government excludes for -
profit educational providers even as it welcomes for - profits in a raft of other vital areas (Full disclosure: Bailey's piece is published by my shop at AEI, as part of my ongoing series on «Private Enterprise in American Education.»)
Not exact matches
In the past year, a for -
profit chain called Baby + Company has built birth centers in five U.S. cities that combine product sales and
educational classes with service
providers such as doulas, lactation consultants and midwives who offer unmedicated delivery in a «spa - like environment.»
Also at 10 a.m., Rep. John Katko will visit numerous meal
providers, not - for -
profit human services agencies, and homeless assistance and
educational outreach programs throughout the City of Syracuse, First English Lutheran Church Food Pantry, 501 James St., Syracuse.
Such organizations, also known as
educational service
providers, are outside nonprofit or for -
profit operators of public schools.
Therefore, today's leaders must continuously build bridges with the larger communities and be willing to collaborate with service
providers in the public, private, and not - for -
profit sectors to insure that the teaching, learning, and care of the «whole child» is at the center of the
educational enterprise.
For -
profit providers of
educational products and services, including members of the Education Industry Association, whether school management companies, tutoring
providers, or developers of learning materials and technologies, view students, parents, school districts, and state departments of education as customers.
These
providers can either be nonprofit organizations (often referred to as charter management organizations [CMOs]-RRB- or for -
profit companies (known as
educational management organizations [EMOs]-RRB-.