Sentences with phrase «profitable betting against»

To learn more about how profitable betting against the public can be, check out our article «Betting Against the Public in the NBA (Past Six Seasons).

Over the summer, we published an article examining just how profitable betting against the pubic in the NFL has been since 2003.

The Crimson Tide have been profitable bets against ranked opponents but division games have proven tricky.

Not exact matches

During the regular season we picked seven games a weekend against the spread as our best bets, and went a comfortably profitable 54 -43-1 in that span.

«Betting against the Pats isn't a profitable endeavor, and Lord knows I've been wrong about some Super Bowl outcomes before,» Will Brinson wrote for CBS Sports.

The market doesn't seem to have much interest in betting against such a profitable and fast - growing company.

We always preach the value of betting against the public, but this season that's been an especially profitable strategy in conference games.

Betting Against the Public was very profitable during the first half of the 2011 MLB Season, and this game is one we'll keep our eye on when selecting the day's Best Bets and Square Plays.

Betting against the public in heavily bet college games has always been profitable and betting against a top - 3 team in particular has also been quite lucrative, hitting at nearly a 55 % ATS rate when getting 25 % oBetting against the public in heavily bet college games has always been profitable and betting against a top - 3 team in particular has also been quite lucrative, hitting at nearly a 55 % ATS rate when getting 25 % obetting against a top - 3 team in particular has also been quite lucrative, hitting at nearly a 55 % ATS rate when getting 25 % or less.

As you can see, our NFL Best Bets have been profitable in each of these seasons and our betting against the public philosophy has been a large part of this success.

This year's NHL Betting Against the Public article details the profitable points for contrarian betting between 2005 and 2011, and teams receiving less than 40 % of moneyline bets had won 75.8 units, or a 1.6 % return on inveBetting Against the Public article details the profitable points for contrarian betting between 2005 and 2011, and teams receiving less than 40 % of moneyline bets had won 75.8 units, or a 1.6 % return on invebetting between 2005 and 2011, and teams receiving less than 40 % of moneyline bets had won 75.8 units, or a 1.6 % return on investment.

Before each season, Sports Insights publishes a Betting Against the Public article that breaks down the most profitable levels (in terms of betting trends levels, home / visitor, etc.) for each of the major Betting Against the Public article that breaks down the most profitable levels (in terms of betting trends levels, home / visitor, etc.) for each of the major betting trends levels, home / visitor, etc.) for each of the major sports.

Now that we're receiving real money percentages from a sharp offshore sportsbook, we can see that betting against the public has been profitable for both favorites and underdogs.

Although the Dodgers were the largest favorite in nearly two years, a more interesting piece of information emerged — Kershaw was actually the most profitable pitcher to bet against in the National League.

Perhaps even more interesting is that two weeks ago the team at Sports Insights sent out the Kansas City Chiefs (+11.5) as a Best Bet against the previously undefeated Green Bay Packers, largely because they fit into this historically profitable contrarian play.

This betting against the pubic philosophy has proven to be one of the simplest, yet consistently profitable betting strategies over the past decade.

Since we subscribe to a contrarian philosophy and tend to go against common perception, our belief was that betting against tired teams would be a profitable betting strategy.

Earlier this week, we explained why betting against the public has been such a profitable strategy during March Madness.

We then utilized the «Moneyline %» filter to determine whether betting against the public had been historically profitable.

Simply betting against every single borderline top 25 team had been revealed to be slightly profitable, but I still had a number of theories to test.

Although betting against the public continues to be a profitable strategy, bettors become increasingly willing to take the underdog.

We always preach the value of betting against the public, but fading the trendy underdog has been a particularly profitable strategy in these heavily bet postseason games.

Looking at every game played since the start of the 2005 season, betting against the public hasn't been a profitable strategy until we reach the 20 % threshold.

Betting against the public was not a profitable strategy in Week 7.

The first was determining whether betting against the public was profitable while the other was testing previously discussed the Zig - Zag theory.

As you can see, it hasn't been a profitable strategy to bet against the public during the 2016 - 17 college basketball season, and there are many reasons for that.

We combine the betting against the public strategies in this article with line movement and profitable historical trends to determine which plays will make our Best Bets and Square Plays.

Betting against the public typically ensures that you're on the same side as the house and has been a historically profitable strategy across all six major US sports.

We have recently profiled several profitable strategies including betting against the public and taking underdogs in divisional games with high totals, but there are many factors that should be considered before placing a wager.

In the past, we have explained how it's profitable to fade (bet against) the trendy underdog, particularly in college athletics.

We have also written at length about how it is profitable to bet against ranked College Football teams, fade NFL teams in «must - win» situations, take NBA underdogs after a blowout loss and pound the over in bad weather NFL games.

We had uncovered a slight edge by betting against the public, but it wasn't profitable.

Our next step was to use a variety of filters to determine if there was any situation in which betting against teams playing in the tail end of a back - to - back would be profitable.

We quickly saw that betting against the public has been profitable at the 30 % level, posting a 3,674 - 5,212 record for +26.14 units won and a 0.3 % ROI.

While betting against the public represents a consistently profitable strategy, it's only one component of employing a contrarian strategy.

We quickly found that betting against the public at the 40 % level was profitable on the over (173 - 152, +12.92 units), but not on the under (409 - 397, -5.73 units).

Even though the return on investment (ROI) steadily climbs as we look at increasingly one - sided public action, betting against the public isn't profitable unless the team is receiving less than 25 % of spread bets.

We have found betting against the public is a very profitable philosophy in the NFL, but there are a number of fascinating trends that could prove advantageous to sports bettors.

Over the past decade, it has become far easier for casual sports bettors to access information which means merely betting against the public isn't as profitable as it once was.

Clearly it hasn't been profitable to wager on ground ball pitchers at Coors Field, so we wanted to see what would happen when fading (betting against) these extreme ground ball pitchers.

Sports Insights employs a Betting Against the Public Strategy that has proven to be very profitable since 2004.

This performance was particularly remarkable since, broadly speaking, betting against the public did not produce profitable returns over the last year.

Going one step further, I found that historically it's been very profitable to bet against the public in neutral site games.

Read Research Proving that Betting Against the Public is Profitable

«Betting against the Public» continues to show a profitable bias over the past five seasons as follows:

This ideology powers our highly profitable MLB Best Bets (+9.5 units this season, +153.9 units since 2008) and our MLB Betting Against the Public system (+8.95 units this season, +116.54 units since 2005).

Although this system has been historically profitable and shows a definitive edge for betting against the public, there are a number of filters we knew could be added to easily increase our return on investment.

We were already well aware that our contrarian philosophy had been historically profitable, so our first objective was to find the ideal betting percentages for betting against the public.

These artificially inflated lines help to explain why betting against the public has been proven to be a historically profitable strategy.

-- Before the season we posted our 2014 MLB Betting Against the Public report which detailed a highly profitable contrarian system.