The profound lack of knowledge about public education, as reflected in comments about public schools being «flush with cash» and badly underserving the nation's children, coupled with policy proposals based on these «alternative facts», pose a threat to a high - quality education for more than 50 million students.
Even if having opinions on this issue should be the preserve of women, surely those expressing such
a profound lack of knowledge should perhaps take a back seat in the debate?
This represents
a profound lack of knowledge about evolution as well as
a profound lack of knowledge about childbirth.
Not exact matches
Either way, you've demonstrated a
profound lack of historical
knowledge.
The effects
of prior
knowledge can be
profound: Students who are ostensibly «poor» readers can suddenly comprehend quite well when reading about a subject they know a lot about — even outperforming «good» readers who
lack background
knowledge the «poor» readers possess.
Given your
profound knowledge of Holocene climate proxies, your ample statistical
knowledge, and the pitiful
lack of a reliable Holocene temperature reconstruction, wouldn't you attempt to make and publish a better Holocene temperature reconstruction?