Sentences with phrase «program evaluation results»

Chapter 7 includes a discussion of the program evaluation results of a study from the Journal of Community Psychology.

Designing and planning a program that reflects current research, program evaluation results, and practices with an evidence base

Not exact matches

Fred believes in a world where leadership character is fundamental to business education programs and performance evaluation processes... a world where «Who» a leader is receives as much attention as «What» the leader is trained to do because it results in greater value for all.

Get resources to help answer questions and avoid common pitfalls that could skew the results of your program evaluations or research studies.

An awareness of this requirement resulted in a program for the «Decade of Spiritual Renewal of the Nation,» open letters by Cardinal Tomasek, and the effort at a new and more positive evaluation of Jan Hus.

It will be important to ensure that the maximum value from existing monitoring and evaluation programs is maintained, and the historical results of these programs are used effectively.

Results of the Cycle IV Germ Plasm Evaluation (GPE) Program at the USDA Meat Animal Research Center (MARC), Clay Center, Nebraska, showed the Galloway crosses placing at the top of the chart for flavor, juiciness and tenderness.

Referrals to craniofacial centers for evaluation of deformational plagiocephaly and brachycephaly are increasing.8 This increase in deformations has been temporally linked to the Back to Sleep program advanced by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1992 that advises the avoidance of the prone sleeping position as a method of reducing the rates of sudden infant death syndrome.10,, 12,13 There is a delay in early gross motor milestones in children forced to sleep supine but these delays seem transient and have not been linked as yet to any longer term problems.14 Children who are encouraged to sleep on their backs and develop abnormal head shapes as a result are a different population than children who spontaneously restricted their movement in bed for one reason or another.

Researchers should continue building the knowledge base about how to implement home visiting programs effectively by reporting information on implementation alongside results of rigorous effectiveness evaluations.

In other words, even when home visitation programs succeed in their goal of changing parent behaviour, these changes do not appear to produce significantly better child outcomes.21, 22 One recent exception, however, was a study of the Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) model with low - income Latino families showing changes in home parenting and better third - grade math achievement.23 Earlier evaluations of HIPPY found mixed results regarding program effectiProgram for Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) model with low - income Latino families showing changes in home parenting and better third - grade math achievement.23 Earlier evaluations of HIPPY found mixed results regarding program effectiprogram effectiveness.

Results published in the American Journal of Public Health were based on evaluation data from Legacy for ChildrenTM, a public health intervention program designed to improve child outcomes by promoting positive parenting among low - income mothers of infants and young children.

In 2009, through the «Race to the Top» program, the federal government offered $ 4.35 billion in competitive grants to states that adopted Common Core standards and developed plans to improve state test scores and teacher evaluation results.

Today, the New York State Education Department made available a detailed data file for the 2012 - 2013 teacher and principal evaluation results for all districts except New York City (which did not begin its teacher evaluation program until the 2013 - 14 school year).

Access to state - supported early childhood programs significantly reduces the likelihood that children will be placed in special education in the third grade, academically benefiting students and resulting in considerable cost savings to school districts, according to new research published today in Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, a peer - reviewed journal of the American Educational Research Association.

While the study, published in JAMA Psychiatry, was designed as a preliminary evaluation of the program, the results suggest that comprehensive MAT treatment in jails and prisons, with linkage to treatment in the community after release, is a promising strategy for rapidly addressing the opioid epidemic nationwide, the researchers say.

Requires the Director to evaluate the program and report evaluation results to Congress.

Evaluation results from the pilot phase will be used to refine program materials prior to making them available to schools throughout the United States, Mexico and Canada.

October 12, 1997 3 - D computer display brings precision to burn assessment An easy - to - use, three - dimensional, computer graphics program is bringing a new level of accuracy, consistency, and standardization to the evaluation of burn patients, which should result in more precise treatment plans and better evaluation of new therapies.

Results of the communication or swallowing evaluation are used to develop an individualized treatment program for your child.

After the program ends, we analyze the results of your employees» evaluations to help you better understand and tailor your future corporate wellness needs.

Since then, the resulting Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium standards have been used or adapted by more than 40 states to guide their own preparation, licensure, and evaluation programs for principals and superintendents.

But all previous evaluations of the effects of private schools or of school voucher programs reported test - score results for both reading and math, or a composite measure of the two, even if the researchers thought that one or the other was a better measure of school performance.

School vouchers provide funds to parents to enable them to enroll their children in private schools and, as a result, are one of the most controversial education reforms in the United States (to see an interview with Patrick Wolf about his evaluation of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program and about its likely future please click here).

As a result, neither OERI nor Planning and Evaluation Service is providing a significant number of scientifically sound and educationally relevant program evaluations.

By choosing a random set of learners and comparing them with other learners receiving a particular intervention, an experimental evaluation can answer with reasonable certainty whether the effects are the result of the program or due to some other explanation.

Evaluation results help to improve programs and determine which ones should be maintained, changed, or closed.

This compares favorably with the results of a RAND evaluation of schools that have initiated other comprehensive school reform programs.

A new evaluation of a national grant program to create smaller, more personalized high schools concludes that the initiative is yielding some promising early results.

So, outcome - based monitoring should be directed at whether the evaluations that IDEA requires are performed on time, by competent and disinterested people, in an unbiased way, and with resulting application to the student's educational program and placement.

To get full «academic» points, the program must require schools to administer standardized assessments, publicly report the results, and submit to independent evaluation.

Say the results of his first - year evaluation are disappointing, confirming the sense of his parents and teachers that the special education intervention program wasn't the best fit for his needs after all.

In an analysis of the program, political scientist William Howell wrote that RttT encouraged applicants to develop «common core state standards,» design a teacher evaluation plan based in part on the performance of their students, ensure «successful conditions for high - performing charter schools,» and numerous other reforms (see «Results of President Obama's Race to the Top,» research, Fall 2015).

The two programs were seen by many conservatives as executive overreach, and when ESEA was reauthorized in 2015 as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), NCLB standardized testing requirements were kept, but the evaluation and accountability systems meant to respond to the results of those tests became the responsibility of individual states.

Early results of an evaluation of an overhauled version of the Drug Abuse Resistance Education curriculum, or DARE, are giving its advocates new hope for the often - criticized program's future.

But when similar results emerge from the evaluations of school voucher programs in three very different cities, we can be fairly confident that the intervention is the main cause of the differences in achievement.

The federal government's official evaluation of the Washington, D.C., Opportunity Scholarship Program points to a common pattern that has emerged amid these mixed results.

In Mike's fourth post criticizing our study he chastises us for generalizing the results from evaluations of entire school choice programs to regulator behavior regarding individual schools.

In explaining the decision to zero out the program, Rep. David R. Obey, D - Wis., the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, cited the results of a preliminary federal evaluation of Reading First, released May 1, which found that the program has had no impact on students» reading comprehension.

Other than budget, this, I believe, is the unspoken real reason we don't perform program evaluations: we are afraid of the results.

The program demonstrated strongly positive results, including not one but two positive evaluations from the RAND Corporation using advanced statistical analysis.

(a) Each plan shall be developed annually and shall include program objectives, activities, program development and maintenance planning, school counseling curriculum, professional development planning, evaluation methods based on data analysis of program results and closing the gap analysis reports to inform program improvement, and assessment of the resources necessary to support positive student outcomes.

The question the initiative seeks to answer is: «If an urban district and its principal training programs provide large numbers of talented, aspiring principals with the right training and on - the - job evaluation and support, will the result be a pipeline of principals who can improve teaching and student achievement district - wide, especially in schools with the greatest needs?»

When early evaluations of the program found that children's gains in IQ were small and faded out as they aged, the resulting uproar quelled President Richard Nixon's attempt to expand the program.

Several recent evaluations of voucher programs that use such publicly available assessment data — including one sponsored by Fordham — have yielded mixed or negative results in terms of the academic efficacy of participation in such programs.

Last year, MDRC released results of a randomized evaluation of a volunteer - based tutoring program, Reading Partners, that increased reading achievement by 0.1 of a standard deviation for an out - of - pocket cost to the schools of only $ 320 per student.

Education researchers had for decades largely ignored the emergence of more rigorous methods for program evaluation and, as a result, the evidentiary cupboard was bare.

The program evaluation illustration comes from the results of a US Department of Education's National Center for Education Evaluation study of «a 93 - hour professional development program focused on deepening math content knowledevaluation illustration comes from the results of a US Department of Education's National Center for Education Evaluation study of «a 93 - hour professional development program focused on deepening math content knowledEvaluation study of «a 93 - hour professional development program focused on deepening math content knowledge.»

The final results of this collaboration is the The State Evaluation of Principal Preparation Programs Toolkit (SEP3 Toolkit).

It is intended to be used in conjunction with the results of other UCEA Center surveys as well as other program and candidate evidence for formative and summative leadership preparation program evaluation.

Results of program completers» annual evaluations in accordance with the timeline as set forth in s. 1012.34.