Sentences with phrase «program violated»

This case centres on a claim that the DVBIA's Downtown Ambassadors Program violated the Human Rights Code by systemically harassing and removing homeless people from public spaces in downtown Vancouver — homeless people, who are disproportionately Indigenous, people with disabilities such as serious mental health issues, and people with addictions.

In addition to alleging the St. Louis - based university allowed the plan to charge excessive fees, the lawsuit alleges the plan's loan program violated ERISA prohibited transaction rules.

They argued the program violated the state's Blaine Amendment, prohibiting aid to sectarian schools and institutions.

A New Hampshire trial court found that the Education Tax Credit program violated this discriminatory amendment and that scholarship funds could therefore not be granted to students attending religious schools.

They won the first round when Franklin County Superior Court Judge Robert H. Hobgood ruled that the program violated the state constitution.

Soon after the law was enacted, public education supporters sued the state, claiming that the voucher program violated the state constitution.

However, the state supreme court found that the use of funds appropriated in SB 515, for K - 12 public education, to instead fund the ESA program violated the requirements of Article 11, Sections 2 and 6.

The state Supreme Court agreed with that reasoning, but found the program violated Article IX Section 7 of the Colorado constitution, which is far more sweeping:

In 2006, the Florida Supreme Court held in Bush v. Holmes that Gov. Jeb Bush's voucher program violated the state constitution.

The Florida Supreme Court later decided, in Bush v. Holmes, that the program was unconstitutional for a different reason; according to the Florida high court, the program violated the state constitution's guarantee of public education.

The en banc Florida First District Court of Appeal held that Florida's publicly funded voucher program violated the state's Blaine Amendment.

The court also rejected opponents» claim that the program violated Article 4, Section 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution, a prohibition on private or local bills.

Those filing the lawsuit claimed that the program violated the state's so - called Blaine Amendment which prohibits public funding «for sectarian purposes.»

State board votes to intervene after officials concluded that Chicago's 2016 overhaul of its special education program violated federal law and regulations.

In December a state trial court judge sided with the plaintiffs, ruling that the program violated the state constitution's local control provision by giving Colorado school boards no «input whatsoever into the instruction to be offered by the private schools» that accepted voucher students.

Denver District Court found in 2011 the program violated the Public School Finance Act of 1994 and other provisions of the state Constitution, but it was overturned by the Colorado Court of Appeals in 2013, saying the petitioners lacked standing to sue under the act and that the voucher program did not violate the state Constitution.

However, before a single scholarship was granted, the ACLU and AU filed a lawsuit claiming that the education tax credit program violated New Hampshire's historically anti-Catholic Blaine Amendment, which states:

The plaintiffs alleged, and the court narrowly concurred, that the program violated a provision of the state constitution that school boards «shall have control of instruction in the public schools of their respective districts.»

With their pro bono representation, I sued several Washington officials, among them Governor Gary Locke, arguing that the state's exclusion of theology majors from the Promise Scholarship program violated my rights to free speech, free exercise of religion, and equal protection under the laws.

Plants that sell frozen beef to the National School Lunch Program violated food safety rules at rates higher than the industry as a whole, according to the Tribune's computer analysis of Agriculture Department data.

Social programs violate every aspect of evolution and self preservation or have you not heard of natural selection, survival of the fittest and Social Darwinism?

How do the BFHI and other breastfeeding programs violate these principles?

Most HIT programs violate all of them.

The longest - running of the cases, filed in federal court in 2000, alleged that Arizona's individual tax - credit program violates the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution by permitting organizations to provide scholarships to students that can be used only at religious schools.

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled in Cain v. Horne that voucher programs violate the aid clause of the Arizona Constitution, which states, «No tax shall be laid or appropriation of public money made in aid of any... private or sectarian school.»

The justices agreed to review a Court of Appeals ruling that the voucher programs violated a state constitutional ban on using public money to help private and religious schools.

Since then, a high - profile court battle ensued, resulting in a Superior Court judge finding that the program violates the state's constitutional mandate to use public funds only for public schools — but thanks to a Court of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the case winds its way through the state appellate courts.

The Niehaus lawsuit, filed by the Arizona School Boards Association and the Arizona Education Association, claims that the Empowerment Account program violates the religion clauses of the Arizona Constitution.

The ACLU - AZ and PFAW claimed that the new scholarship programs violated the Arizona Constitution because they allow public funds to pay for educating children in private schools.

School choice opponents also challenged Arizona's voucher programs for disabled and foster care students, claiming the programs violated Arizona's two Blaine Amendments.

The new lawsuit challenging the Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Account program claims the program violates the same constitutional provisions used to strike down the previous voucher programs — specifically, that they don't offer choice beyond a private school option — but Empowerment Accounts differ from these earlier programs in important and constitutionally relevant ways.

After concluding that the plaintiffs in both suits had standing to pursue their claims, the state supreme court began with a discussion of whether the ESA program violates Article 11, Section 2, which requires the state legislature to provide for «a uniform system of common schools.»

... For these reasons, we conclude that the plaintiffs have not established that the creation of an ESA program violates Section 2.»

The NCAE and the NCSBA, along with North Carolina citizens and local school boards, have filed two lawsuits alleging that the program violates the North Carolina Constitution.

In December 2013, the NCAE and the NCSBA, along with North Carolina citizens and local school boards, filed two lawsuits alleging that the program violates the North Carolina Constitution.

Louisiana's voucher program suffered an additional challenge in May when, in an unrelated case, the Supreme Court of Louisiana upheld a lower court's ruling that the voucher program violates the state's constitution by illegally diverting money earmarked for public schools to private and religious institutions.

Being highly «related to» fuel economy, California's AB 1493 program violates EPCA's express prohibition.

Senior U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, ruling in a case brought against the Bush administration by the American Civil Liberties Union and others, issued a 44 - page opinion finding that the National Security Agency's wiretap program violates the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution, the separation of powers doctrine, statutory law and the Administrative Procedures Act.

We turn next to Appellants» assertion that the PROTECT Act's provision authorizing fast - track programs violates their due process and equal protection rights because similarly situated individuals in districts with fast - track programs could receive lower sentences.

It should be noted that this opinion addresses only whether the use of a competitor's name in internet search - engine advertising programs violates the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.

A report under Chairman Tom Wheeler's FCC said AT&T and Verizon's zero - rating programs violated net neutrality, but that inquiry was dropped by current FCC chairman Ajit Pai.

Under that precedent, the rule barring Planned Parenthood providers from the Women's Health Program violates their First Amendment rights to speech and association because it bars their participation in that program due to their constitutionally protected conduct in which they engage using only their own private funds.

Not exact matches

The majority opinion said Aereo is not the first to design systems to avoid copyright liability and noted that the same accusation could be made about Cablevision because the company created separate user - associated copies of each recorded program to comply with copyright law instead of using more efficient shared copies that might have been found to violate copyrights.

«This program denies ride requests to fraudulent users who are violating our terms of service — whether that's people aiming to physically harm drivers, competitors looking to disrupt our operations, or opponents who collude with officials on secret «stings» meant to entrap drivers,» the company said.

The networks successfully shut down Aereo, a more prominent competitor to FilmOn X, when the U.S. Supreme Court in June, 2014 said that company violated the broadcasters» copyrights in retransmitting their programs to subscribers» devices via the Internet.

Videos that violate copyrights — for example, if your video contains copyrighted music that you don't own or visual content that doesn't belong to you — don't quality for this program.

SAN FRANCISCO — A Northern California company that federal officials say violated salary requirements of the country's foreign - worker visa program will pay a total of $ 173,044 to 12 workers, the U.S. Department of Labor said Tuesday.

The hearing will come the day after West Virginia disclosed an investigation into whether Mylan violated antitrust laws or defrauded the state's Medicaid program.

The senior official said the end result of how the system currently works is that foreign workers are often brought in at less pay to replace American workers, «violating the principle of the program.»

The specific legal grounds for the Texas coalition's challenge to the remaining DACA program are that it violates the Constitution's direction for the president to execute the nation's laws, that it was adopted without allowing the public an advance chance to comment on it, and that it exceeds presidential power under federal immigration laws and is thus illegal.