Concerned that varying education programs are creating «two Connecticuts, one for the rich and one for the poor,» the state's department of education is studying whether wealthy districts offer substantially better
programs than poorer ones.
Not exact matches
To be eligible for Lifeline, participants must have an income less
than 135 % of the federal poverty level or qualify for
one of several other
programs for the
poor, such as Medicaid or food stamps.
One of the appalling things about «social conservatism» was that it was no less set on expanding government
programs for the
poor than the welfarist's agenda.
Pea Pod's income eligibility criteria is
one household member higher
than that of typical government assistance
programs allowing us to the «working
poor» and make a long - term difference in the lives of more Georgia families.
They say they've already cut back and laid off and that a cap would erode arts, sports and special
programs, and hurt
poorer and rural districts, which are more dependent on state aid
than rich
ones with greater property wealth.
Gillibrand described the bill's Medicaid changes as particularly far - reaching, pointing out the
program now provides health coverage to
one in five Americans — «not only the
poor, but two - thirds of those in nursing homes, more
than 30 million children, and countless individuals with disabilities.»
Only about 46 percent of children aged three through six in families below the federal poverty line are enrolled in center - based early childhood
programming, compared to 72 percent of children in families above the federal poverty line.1
Poor children are about 25 percent less likely to be ready for school at age five than children who are not poor.2 Once in school, these children lag behind their better - off peers in reading and math, are less likely to be enrolled in college preparatory coursework, less likely to graduate, and over 10 percent more likely to require remediation if they attend a four - year post-secondary institution.3 All of these issues compound one another to create a cycle of low opportunity: children in poverty are less likely to achieve high educational attainment, and low educational attainment leads to lower median weekly earnings and higher rates of unemploym
Poor children are about 25 percent less likely to be ready for school at age five
than children who are not
poor.2 Once in school, these children lag behind their better - off peers in reading and math, are less likely to be enrolled in college preparatory coursework, less likely to graduate, and over 10 percent more likely to require remediation if they attend a four - year post-secondary institution.3 All of these issues compound one another to create a cycle of low opportunity: children in poverty are less likely to achieve high educational attainment, and low educational attainment leads to lower median weekly earnings and higher rates of unemploym
poor.2 Once in school, these children lag behind their better - off peers in reading and math, are less likely to be enrolled in college preparatory coursework, less likely to graduate, and over 10 percent more likely to require remediation if they attend a four - year post-secondary institution.3 All of these issues compound
one another to create a cycle of low opportunity: children in poverty are less likely to achieve high educational attainment, and low educational attainment leads to lower median weekly earnings and higher rates of unemployment.
For more
than 20 years, this nonprofit headquartered in Houston has been running health
programs to help the needy in Guatemala,
one of the world's
poorest countries.
Officials at the U.N. Population Fund, which supports family planning
programs around the world, said the new projections illustrated the importance of rich countries continuing to help
poorer ones to ensure that couples have no more children
than they want.
Young children under age 6 are more likely
than any other age group to be
poor, with nearly
one - quarter of children living in poverty and nearly half living in low - income families.2 Children are also the largest age cohort participating in public benefit
programs such as SNAP, Medicaid, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and research shows that these
programs that help families meet their basic needs are effective at lifting families like Kelly's out of poverty and promoting child well - being.3 When benefit
programs such as nutrition assistance, Medicaid, and tax credits are taken into consideration, the child poverty rate in the United States is reduced by half.4
In a population in which food insecurity and
poor nutrition are an immediate reality, however, investing in earlier prenatal food supplementation
programs than is usually practiced is
one strategy that can support better child outcomes.