Bair indicated that the nasal spray is
prohibited by her religious beliefs that she not inject or ingest foreign substances.
Not exact matches
Lord Chief Justice Morgan, delivering his judgment, said: «Anyone who applies a
religious aspect or a political aspect to the provision of services may be caught
by equality legislation, not because the legislation treats their
religious belief or political opinion less favourably but because that person seeks to distinguish, on a basis that is
prohibited, between those who will receive that service and those who will not.»
If TWU is identified as an education or
religious institution «primarily engaged in serving the interests of persons identified
by a
prohibited ground of discrimination [i.e., Christians, or people willing to abide
by what TWU identifies as Christian
beliefs — religion being a
prohibited ground]» (which it almost certainly is) the fact that TWU may limit attendance to people who subscribe to similar
beliefs is not necessarily discriminatory.
Anonymous lawyer... what about our society
prohibiting discrimination based on
religious beliefs confirmed
by the Supreme Court of Canada?