Lecker's latest commentary piece is a «must read» for many reasons, but «the most disturbing issue of all is that creating separate schools for «gifted» children violates Connecticut law and policies
prohibiting school segregation.»
On the other hand, it is far from clear that the original supporters of the Fourteenth Amendment believed that
it prohibited school segregation.
Not exact matches
The first is that the equal protection clause was actually intended to
prohibit the perpetuation of a caste system, and that
school segregation was obviously attempting to perpetuate a racial caste system.
To begin, many legal historians and constitutional scholars seem to agree that the equal protection clause, as originally understood, did not
prohibit segregation, because integration — including integrated
schools — involved a «social» right, not a civil right, and therefore fell outside the ambit of that clause.
Yet if the equal protection clause does not apply to
school segregation, it obviously would not
prohibit the voluntary integration of
schools, either.
School segregation would be prohibited, but school integration would be tolerated — indeed, encou
School segregation would be
prohibited, but
school integration would be tolerated — indeed, encou
school integration would be tolerated — indeed, encouraged.