Wicker, then a congressman, was one of the two coauthors, in 1995, of the Dickey - Wicker amendment, which
prohibits federal funding for research in which human embryos are destroyed, and which sits at the heart of the current legal dispute.
Second, is their argument — that hESC research violates the Dickey - Wicker Amendment, which
prohibits federal funding for research that destroys or harms embryos — reasonable?
Not exact matches
They argued that NIH's July guidelines implementing an order from President Barack Obama to lift limits on hESC
research violated the Dickey - Wicker Amendment, a law that
prohibits federal funding for «
research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed.»
Currently,
federal law allows the NIH to
fund research on aborted fetal tissue but
prohibits grants
for any investigation that harms a human embryo.