The Institute for Energy Security (IES) has
projected fuel price increases between 1 and 2 percent in the first pricing...
Not exact matches
Three aspiring gold miners have announced an
increase in
projected free cash flow for their respective
projects as a result of the strong gold
price, coupled with falling
fuel costs.
Natural Gas Natural gas futures were among the quarter's key decliners -LRB--7.5 %, to US$ 2.73 per million British thermal units) as production growth outweighed seasonal consumption and higher exports of the
fuel.1 Spot
prices saw an even larger drop of 20.6 % (to US$ 2.81) as the support of December's weather - related demand spikes faded and a more normal winter pattern developed.1 Natural gas generally took its downward
price cues from elevated US production and growth in the natural gas - focused rig count, which
increased from 179 to 194 in March alone.2 Despite the
price drop, traders remained optimistic given surging US shale - gas exports and a supply deficit that was 20 % larger than the five - year average at March - end, the biggest in four years.3 Moreover, total natural gas inventories of 1.38 trillion cubic feet were nearly 33 % below their year - ago level.3 Meanwhile, the market appeared focused on an anticipated production surge (2018 is
projected to be a record growth year for gas supplies) and may have overlooked intensifying demand as US exports increasingly helped drain supplies.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) openly shared its 2010 analysis of a
projected 4 to 19 %
fuel price increase by 2020 as a result of the LCFS (explained below).
They promote spending $ 22 billion just in federal money during FY - 2014 on climate change studies; costly solar
projects of every description; wind turbines that blight scenic vistas and slaughter millions of birds and bats annually, while wind energy developers are exempted from endangered species and other environmental laws that apply to all other industries; and ethanol programs that require millions of acres of farmland and vast quantities of water, fertilizer, pesticides and fossil
fuel energy to produce a gasoline additive that reduces mileage, harms engines, drives up food
prices... and
increases CO2 emissions.
«Accordingly, as we concluded in D.P.U. 10 - 54, at 229 - 230, the Cape Wind facility will produce far greater benefits in terms of its: (1) contribution to narrowing the
projected gap between supply and demand of renewable resources; (2) contribution to compliance with GWSA emission reductions requirements; (3) contribution to
fuel diversity; (4)
price suppression effects; (5) ability to act as a hedge against future
fuel price increases and volatility; (6) contribution to system reliability; and (7) ability to moderate system peak load.