Not exact matches
It's time for
fossil fuel companies to use their considerable capx budgets to invest
in solar pv or wind
projects and get a better roi (return on
investment) for investors.
Over a year which has seen large banks halt funding for
fossil fuel projects, major institutions divest from oil, gas and coal holdings, and oil companies snap up power and renewables companies
in a bid to diversify their asset base, research published today by the UK Sustainable
Investment and Finance Association (UKSIF) and the Climate Change Collaboration suggests nervousness over climate risk has shot up
in financial circles.
Ban the export credit guarantee department from underwriting risky
investment in foreign
fossil fuel projects.»
«There is a realization that a diversified suite of renewable energy resources will displace
fossil fuel,» said Monty Worthington, who is directing a tidal energy
project in Alaska for the Maine - based Ocean Renewable Power Co. «To establish a place
in the emerging marine renewable market, the time for [U.S.]
investment is now.»
A new report shows how multilateral development banks, including the World Bank, gave over $ 9 billion
in funding for
fossil fuel projects in 2016, nearly all of it following the Paris Agreement being reached and despite claims that they were acting on climate and adjusting their
investment strategies.
Yet while money may be flowing away from many
fossil fuel investments, investing
in solar
projects has traditionally been somewhat cumbersome — requiring significant capital, legal expertise, and industry connections.
The report argues that over the next 20 years
investments in new
fossil fuel extraction and transportation
projects are forecasted to be about $ 14 trillion.
National and state
investment in and support of CCS are completely consistent with the Donald Trump Administration's goals to invest
in infrastructure
projects, continue U.S. reliance on
fossil fuels, and create jobs.
Rapidly declining costs of wind and solar energy technologies, increasing concerns about the environmental and climate change impacts of
fossil fuels, and sustained
investment in renewable energy
projects all point to a not - so - distant future
in which renewable energy plays a pivotal role
in the electric power system of the 21st century.
The upcoming revision of the EU's multi-annual budget is «a significant opportunity» to increase
investments in clean technologies and «explicitly exclude
fossil fuels and other unsustainable
projects» from public funding, the group wrote
in its report.
«More than 80 leading economists from 20 countries have signed a Declaration on Climate Finance urging for an immediate end to
investment in new
fossil fuel projects and a dramatic increase
in renewable energy
investment.»
After recent bank protests and a burning global spotlight, several banks have dropped
investments in DAPL or have committed, as U.S. Bank recently did, to revisit their financing of future
fossil fuel projects threatening Indigenous sovereignty, water and land.
But even as
investments in renewables grow, the IEA
projects that
fossil fuels will still supply 75 percent of our energy needs a quarter - century from now.
So, yes, it is important to maintain Australia's future export income, but given the small amount of export income we actually receive from
fossil fuel exports, it should be relatively easy to replace that with new climate - safe exports and new foreign
investment in local renewable energy
projects provided we plan and prepare accordingly.
If up to two thirds of
fossil fuels can not be burned, investors
in these
projects risk being left with up to $ 2 trillion
in «stranded assets»,
investments rendered valueless by a combination of rapid technological progress from renewables, more stringent climate policies and shifts
in market sentiment.
They will lock Europe into
fossil fuel use, jeopardise emissions reduction targets and prevent
investments in genuine solutions — like the development of community renewable energy resources, and energy savings
projects.
Together, they're calling out the hypocrisy of continued institutional
investments in new
fossil fuel projects.
Instead, as the Sane Energy
Project site notes, «We support
investment in renewable energy and the goal of zero
fossil fuel dependence by 2030.»