Not exact matches
A U.K. -
based Antarctic research
project called Project MIDAS monitoring the effects of climate change on an ice shelf called Larsen C announced that a vast rift in the rapidly warming pole has split entirely and created a brand new iceberg — the third largest in the
project called
Project MIDAS monitoring the effects of climate change on an ice shelf called Larsen C announced that a vast rift in the rapidly warming pole has split entirely and created a brand new iceberg — the third largest in the
Project MIDAS monitoring the effects of climate change on an ice shelf called Larsen C announced that a vast rift in the rapidly
warming pole has split entirely and created a brand new iceberg — the third largest in the world.
«Under climate change, the Pacific Islands region is
projected to become
warmer, less oxygenated, more acidic, and have lower production of plankton that form the
base of oceanic food webs,» said lead author Rebecca Asch, Nereus Program alumnus and Assistant Professor at East Carolina University.
Researchers
projected warming scenarios that vary
based on what societal actions are taken to reduce emissions.
Their findings,
based on output from four global climate models of varying ocean and atmospheric resolution, indicate that ocean temperature in the U.S. Northeast Shelf is
projected to
warm twice as fast as previously
projected and almost three times faster than the global average.
«When we included
projected Antarctic wind shifts in a detailed global ocean model, we found water up to 4 °C
warmer than current temperatures rose up to meet the
base of the Antarctic ice shelves,» said lead author Dr Paul Spence from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (ARCCSS).
«For every ton of CO2 emitted [into] the atmosphere, the natural sinks are removing less carbon than before,» says biologist Josep «Pep» Canadell, executive director of the Global Carbon
Project — an Australia —
based research consortium devoted to analyzing the pollution behind global
warming.
However, a new University of Minnesota study with more than 1,000 young trees has found that plants also adjust — or acclimate — to a
warmer climate and may release only one - fifth as much additional carbon dioxide than scientists previously believed, The study, published today in the journal Nature, is
based on a five - year
project, known as «B4Warmed,» that simulated the effects of climate change on 10 boreal and temperate tree species growing in an open - air setting in 48 plots in two forests in northern Minnesota.
«One demanding test of the validity of the computer simulations of the climate of the earth is
based on temperature records from the Arctic... When tested against the Arctic temperature record, therefore, the computer forecasts are seen to exaggerate the
projected warming by a large amount.»
Using these much smaller, observationally
based climate sensitivities, the
projected warming from continued use of fossil fuels will be moderate and benign for the foreseeable future.
From an instantaneous doubling of atmospheric CO2 content from the pre-industrial
base level, some models would
project 2 °C (3.6 °F) of global
warming in less than a decade while others would
project that it would take more than a century to achieve that much
warming.
Based on historical temperature measurements and
projected warming to the year 2100, this could increase by 800 - 1200m,» explained co-author Walter Immerzeel of Utrecht University in the Netherlands.
Projects of particular interest are those that apply a systemic lens to the root causes of global
warming; enroll the leadership of frontline communities most vulnerable to the impact of climate change; push for broad -
based civic engagement and community action; and wherever possible leverage the value artists and culture bearers bring to processes for devising and deploying practical solutions to this global crisis.
Master printmaker Todd Anderson's practice involves long - term, team -
based projects that investigate ecological changes to wilderness caused by global
warming.
The
projected warming is also
based on high - end climate sensitivity.
The administration of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas said its decision was
based on
projected risks to health and the environment from global
warming.
The highlighted points of emphasis in the report have been the dominant focus of research in the field of science communication and science studies for the past 15 years and the
basis for recent innovative
projects such as the World Wide Views on Global
Warming initiative.
we can see clearly that while K08
projected 0.06 ºC cooling, the temperature record from HadCRUT (which was the
basis of the bet) shows 0.07 ºC
warming (using GISTEMP, it is 0.11 ºC).
«Future projections
based on theory and high - resolution dynamical models consistently suggest that greenhouse
warming will cause the globally averaged intensity of tropical cyclones to shift towards stronger storms,» Knutson et al. (2010); Grinsted et al. (2013)
projected «a twofold to sevenfold increase in the frequency of Katrina magnitude events for a 1 °C rise in global temperature.»
Thus they
project temperature change primarily on the
basis of CO2, succumbing to the omitted variable fallacy, ie., they falsely attribute
warming to CO2 because natural variables which may have caused
warming aren't even included in the models.
And given the influence a
project like PlanMaryland is expected to have on growth in the state for decades, one would also think that we'd be reviewing and pulling from the plan any provision
based on the bad premise of man - made global
warming.
In 2010, the Oregon Global
Warming Commission launched its Roadmap to 2020
project, designed to offer recommendations for how Oregon can meet its 2020 greenhouse gas reduction goal, get a head start on its 2050 goal, and support a clean energy -
based Oregon economy.
Tamino provides a nice simple graphic showing that global temperature remains within the
projected range
based on previous decades of
warming:
One of the most feared of all model -
based projections of CO2 - induced global
warming is that temperatures will rise to such a degree as to cause a disastrous melting / destabilization of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS), which melting is subsequently
projected to raise global sea level by several meters.
Consistent with the aforementioned sea level rise acceleration, a number of articles have
projected global sea level rise of around 1m or more by 2100,
based on past estimates of sea level rise (in response to
warming) and
based on melting of land ice (with thermal expansion):
«[1] Projections of 21st century
warming may be derived by using regression -
based methods to scale a model's
projected warming up or down according to whether it under - or over-predicts the response to anthropogenic forcings over the historical period.
Gillett et al. derive the TCR by using a regression -
based method to scale the model's
projected warming up or down according to whether it under - or over-predicts the response to anthropogenic forcings over the historical period.
They use a regression -
based method to scale the model -
projected warming up or down according to whether it under - or over-predicts the response to anthropogenic forcings over the historical period.
Gillett et al. then use their TCR estimate to
project how much the planet will
warm in the future
based on several different emissions scenarios.
The specific challenges for energy efficient construction in regions with a
warm climate will be presented
based on these and other
projects at the International Passive House Conference 2016 in Darmstadt this April.
The Physical Science
Basis, Cambridge, 996 pp, 2007), climate models
project a fast rate of southwestern
warming accompanied by devastating droughts (Seager et al. in Science 316:1181 — 1184, 2007; Williams et al. in Nat Clim Chang, 2012).
The questions we are trying to answer are how much
warmer was it at different latitudes and how can that information be used to
project future temperatures
based on what we know about CO2 levels?»
Wasdell said that the draft submitted by scientists contained a metric
projecting cumulative total anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, on the
basis of which a «carbon budget» was estimated — the quantity of carbon that could be safely emitted without breaching the 2 degrees Celsius limit to avoid dangerous global
warming.
During the course of IPY, the Global
Warming and Marine Mammals (GWAMM)
project, led by Fisheries and Oceans Canada, aimed to develop community -
based monitoring of marine mammal populations in the greater Hudson Bay region.
The Yale
Project on Climate Change and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication recently released Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans» Global
Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in January 2010, a study
based on interviews conducted December 24, 2009 — January 3, 2010.
In other words, Hansen's model -
based Scenario A grossly overestimated the GH
warming that would result, thereby invalidating his climate model's ability to correctly
project GH
warming.
The
bases for all three «scenarios» were clearly spelled out by Hansen at the time, and the one that comes closest on CO2 emissions is «Scenario A», with the highest
projected rate of
warming.
«
Based on historical relationships, the impact on hurricane activity of the
projected shear change could be as large — and in the opposite sense — as that of the
warming oceans.»
(11/15/07) «Ban the Bulb: Worldwide Shift from Incandescents to Compact Fluorescents Could Close 270 Coal - Fired Power Plants» (5/9/07) «Massive Diversion of U.S. Grain to Fuel Cars is Raising World Food Prices» (3/21/07) «Distillery Demand for Grain to Fuel Cars Vastly Understated: World May Be Facing Highest Grain Prices in History» (1/4/07) «Santa Claus is Chinese OR Why China is Rising and the United States is Declining» (12/14/06) «Exploding U.S. Grain Demand for Automotive Fuel Threatens World Food Security and Political Stability» (11/3/06) «The Earth is Shrinking: Advancing Deserts and Rising Seas Squeezing Civilization» (11/15/06) «U.S. Population Reaches 300 Million, Heading for 400 Million: No Cause for Celebration» (10/4/06) «Supermarkets and Service Stations Now Competing for Grain» (7/13/06) «Let's Raise Gas Taxes and Lower Income Taxes» (5/12/06) «Wind Energy Demand Booming: Cost Dropping Below Conventional Sources Marks Key Milestone in U.S. Shift to Renewable Energy» (3/22/06) «Learning From China: Why the Western Economic Model Will not Work for the World» (3/9/05) «China Replacing the United States and World's Leading Consumer» (2/16/05)» Foreign Policy Damaging U.S. Economy» (10/27/04) «A Short Path to Oil Independence» (10/13/04) «World Food Security Deteriorating: Food Crunch In 2005 Now Likely» (05/05/04) «World Food Prices Rising: Decades of Environmental Neglect Shrinking Harvests in Key Countries» (04/28/04) «Saudis Have U.S. Over a Barrel: Shifting Terms of Trade Between Grain and Oil» (4/14/04) «Europe Leading World Into Age of Wind Energy» (4/8/04) «China's Shrinking Grain Harvest: How Its Growing Grain Imports Will Affect World Food Prices» (3/10/04) «U.S. Leading World Away From Cigarettes» (2/18/04) «Troubling New Flows of Environmental Refugees» (1/28/04) «Wakeup Call on the Food Front» (12/16/03) «Coal: U.S. Promotes While Canada and Europe Move Beyond» (12/3/03) «World Facing Fourth Consecutive Grain Harvest Shortfall» (9/17/03) «Record Temperatures Shrinking World Grain Harvest» (8/27/03) «China Losing War with Advancing Deserts» (8/4/03) «Wind Power Set to Become World's Leading Energy Source» (6/25/03) «World Creating Food Bubble Economy
Based on Unsustainable Use of Water» (3/13/03) «Global Temperature Near Record for 2002: Takes Toll in Deadly Heat Waves, Withered Harvests, & Melting Ice» (12/11/02) «Rising Temperatures & Falling Water Tables Raising Food Prices» (8/21/02) «Water Deficits Growing in Many Countries» (8/6/02) «World Turning to Bicycle for Mobility and Exercise» (7/17/02) «New York: Garbage Capital of the World» (4/17/02) «Earth's Ice Melting Faster Than
Projected» (3/12/02) «World's Rangelands Deteriorating Under Mounting Pressure» (2/5/02) «World Wind Generating Capacity Jumps 31 Percent in 2001» (1/8/02) «This Year May be Second
Warmest on Record» (12/18/01) «World Grain Harvest Falling Short by 54 Million Tons: Water Shortages Contributing to Shortfall» (11/21/01) «Rising Sea Level Forcing Evacuation of Island Country» (11/15/01) «Worsening Water Shortages Threaten China's Food Security» (10/4/01) «Wind Power: The Missing Link in the Bush Energy Plan» (5/31/01) «Dust Bowl Threatening China's Future» (5/23/01) «Paving the Planet: Cars and Crops Competing for Land» (2/14/01) «Obesity Epidemic Threatens Health in Exercise - Deprived Societies» (12/19/00) «HIV Epidemic Restructuring Africa's Population» (10/31/00) «Fish Farming May Overtake Cattle Ranching As a Food Source» (10/3/00) «OPEC Has World Over a Barrel Again» (9/8/00) «Climate Change Has World Skating on Thin Ice» (8/29/00) «The Rise and Fall of the Global Climate Coalition» (7/25/00) «HIV Epidemic Undermining sub-Saharan Africa» (7/18/00) «Population Growth and Hydrological Poverty» (6/21/00) «U.S. Farmers Double Cropping Corn And Wind Energy» (6/7/00) «World Kicking the Cigarette Habit» (5/10/00) «Falling Water Tables in China» (5/2/00) Top of page
... We've also participated in a pilot
project to measure public opinion about the global
warming issue and to see if a factual, science -
based public information campaign can have an impact.
Eric Michelman, the Seattle -
based climate activist behind the campaign, said he started the
project to get more climate scientists» voices into public conversations about global
warming.
The administration of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius said its decision was
based on
projected risks to health and the environment from global
warming.
In any event I don't understand the paper's relevance to your claim that the
warming is decelerating, since you're
basing that claim on what's happened up to now, for which we have billions of data points, whereas the three or four numbers you quoted from the paper were produced by model runs
projecting hundreds of years into the future.
The
bases for his claims relied on 3 simplistic assumptions that a) bleaching is evidence that coral have reached their limit of maximum thermal tolerance, b) bleaching will increase due to global
warming, and c) coral can not adapt quickly enough to temperatures
projected by climate models.
I think thy have «exaggerated» the 2xCO2 climate sensitivity (see posts to Jeff Glassman), as well as the assumed future CO2 levels in most of the model -
based «scenarios and storylines», and thus have greatly exaggerated the
projected future
warming from increased CO2.
The
projected future
warming projections (for the end of this century) have been reduced a bit, starting from essentially the same
base (AR5: 1986 - 2005 = +0.26 °C versus AR4: 1980 - 1999 = +0.23 °C):
Party members are in fact divided about the issue of climate change, a new study
based on three years of data from the Yale
Project on Climate Change Communication finds, with 44 percent ready to admit that global
warming is happening.
Africa's climate is
warmer than it was 100 years ago and model -
based projections of future greenhouse gas induced climate change for the continent
project that this
warming will continue, and in most scenarios, accelerate (Hulme et al. 2001; Christensen et al. 2007).
The report singles out coastal areas, including low - lying island nations, as hot spots of elevated risk that may not be completely manageable due to the steady climb in global sea levels
projected to take place during the rest of this century, as the planet
warms and land -
based ice sheets melt.
One important source of guidance is
Project Drawdown, a global coalition of researchers, scientists, economists and others, that, in recent years, has built a model to evaluate and rank the top active solutions to global
warming,
based on their actual impact on greenhouse gas emissions.
If a customer wanted to know the mean temperature at their location from 2030 - 2040 for some planning (or it could be sea level), would you
base it on the mean of the 20th century, the mean of the last decade, or a
projected forwards
warming at the rate of the last few decades?