Naomi Oreskes accuses them as being «Merchants of Doubt» in her book of the same name, but neither she nor any other
prominent accuser ranging from Al Gore to Ross Gelbspan ever offers a scintilla of evidence proving skeptic climate scientists are in any such conspiracy.
Pt 7, «Cancerous Greenpeace / Desmogblog / Gelbspan Stuff»: What's detailed in this post is how Dave Rado's Ofcom complaint is first and foremost pushing absolutely nothing more than guilt - by - association «evidence» to indict skeptic climate scientists of industry - funded corruption, and secondly, how Rado, much like any other
prominent accuser, is enslaved to an accusation narrative which ultimately relies on sources who repeat material which inevitably traces back to Ross Gelbspan and the clique of enviro - activists surrounding him when he and they got the first real media traction for the accusation.
He shows very convincingly that his most
prominent accusers are motivated by misguided and vain moralistic indignation far more than any grasp of what Strauss actually wrote.
Not exact matches
The
prominent Georgia pastor being sued for sexual coercion by four men will face his
accusers in court next summer if the cases can not be settled through mediation before then.
Essentially, Niose is saddled with the same «three degrees of separation from Gelbspan» problem that every other
prominent public
accuser has.
Decade - old messages played a
prominent role in the trial of former CBC radio host Jian Ghomeshi, as lawyer Marie Henein, defending Ghomeshi on several charges, confronted his
accusers about their online interactions with him following the alleged sexual assaults.