Prop. 71 was sold to voters mainly on
the promise of embryonic stem cell therapy.
Not exact matches
Let us be thankful that a tool for discrediting the pro-life movement (shaming us for opposing magical cures
promised by
embryonic stem -
cell research) has itself been taken out
of their hands.
The year's most prominent science issue, federal support
of embryonic stem cell research, is so controversial that the sons
of Ronald Reagan gave dueling speeches at the opposing party conventions; Michael Reagan backs President George W. Bush's policies, including the ban on funding for research on new
stem cell lines, while Ron supports Senator John Kerry's
promise to lift restrictions.
In the past few months, researchers in the United States and Japan have described a
promising way
of deriving
embryonic stem cells from skin
cells (
of mice) without destroying embryos — the «Holy Grail
of biotechnology,» as The Times
of London put it.
Others trumpeted «alternative» techniques that
promise the creation
of embryonic stem cells without destroying embryos.
Both Obama and Clinton voted against the Hope Act and many
stem cell research supporters have criticized the bill, saying it's a distraction and diversion
of funds away from the greater
promise of embryonic cells.
There is
promising news today for those who hope to turn the potential
of undifferentiated
stem cells into medical miracles: Researchers are reporting a way to produce insulin - producing
cells from mouse
embryonic stem cells.
This insight provides new avenues for improving the quality and stability
of embryonic stem cells — an essential requirement to fulfil their
promise in regenerative medicine.
First,
promising to restore the integrity
of science while seeking vast medical benefits for many, President Obama repealed the restrictions set by President Bush on the use
of federal funds for
embryonic stem cell research.
But for well over a decade now, ethically contentious human
embryonic stem cell research (hESCR) has notably failed to live up to all its hype, with
promises of miracle cures within «five to 10 years» remaining unfulfilled.
Diabetes has long been one
of the main diseases for which human
embryonic stem cell (embryo - destroying) research, or hESCR, was claimed to hold the greatest
promise of curing.
And while there are now fewer obstacles impeding
embryonic stem cell research, the
promise of iPS
cells has taken them beyond ethical considerations.
Despite the
promise of iPS
cells, scientists are still struggling to understand whether their developmental potential is equivalent to that
of embryonic stem cells.
The excitement surrounding cellular reprogramming and the possibility
of federal funding for human
embryonic stem cell (ESC) research in the US could be overshadowing another
promising therapeutic source
of stem cells: those derived via parthenogenesis, some researchers say.
Their
promise was so great that when President Obama announced last March that he was lifting the ban on the use
of federal money for research on human
embryonic stem cells, critics on the right were apoplectic: iPS
cells, they said, made such a move scientifically unjustified.
The discovery, by scientists at Kyoto University and the University
of Wisconsin - Madison, seemed to
promise a way out
of the bitter debates over
embryonic -
stem -
cell research: rather than using human embryos as a source
of stem cells, produce them from adult
cells.
In 2004, this editorial page backed Proposition 71, a $ 3 billion ballot measure meant to bypass then - President George W. Bush's ban on human
embryonic stem cell research and to put California in the forefront
of this hugely
promising field.
Jang has conducted research with
embryonic stem cells in the past, but she and others are finding great
promise in another kind
of stem cell called induced pluripotent
stem cells, or iPS
cells.
The NIH announced in the Federal Register on Tuesday that it plans to tweak its
stem cell guidelines in order to accept a wider array
of scientifically
promising human
embryonic stem cells.
But even before the cash spigot opens, the government may close it — or even try to limit research on human
embryonic stem cells, the more
promising and controversial type
of stem cell.
Washington — Leaders
of a congressional effort to boost
embryonic stem -
cell research will huddle soon to develop strategies for passing their bill around President Bush's
promised veto.
Embryonic stem cells — «pluripotent»
cells that can develop into any type
of cell in the human body — hold tremendous
promise for regenerative medicine, in which damaged organs and tissues can be replaced or repaired.
However welcome the recent announcement that a team
of scientists based at Newcastle University, has grown a section
of human liver using
stem cells from umbilical cords, rather than from the more controversial source
of embryonic stem cells, and whatever the eventual
promise or potential
of harvesting organs for transplantation from genetically modified pigs, the benefits
of either
of these two pioneering techniques to currently dying / suffering patients, remain both elusive and distant.