Not exact matches
New York also
promised to tie student performance on state exams to
teacher evaluations in its application for a waiver from No Child Left Behind, legislation under President George W. Bush that requires states to hit certain performance benchmarks on standardized
tests.
«The
promise is that if
teachers present the materials within the modules to their students and stick to the minute - by - minute schedule, their students will know everything needed to be successful on the
test,» Champoux said.
One Cuomo
promise was «to break... the only remaining public monopoly,» referring to public schools and
teachers unions, by promoting charter schools, private school tuition tax credits, and a new round of
teacher evaluations based on Common Core - aligned high - stakes
testing.
He criticised SATs as a «distraction from the real education that professional
teachers want to give their children» and
promised that his party would work to end the current
testing system.
For one thing, in getting a waiver from the federal No Child Left Behind Act, Indiana (like other states)
promised the Obama administration it would adopt standards that met federal criteria; align curricula and teaching; select, pilot, and administer new
tests aligned to the standards; and integrate the standards into both school - and
teacher - accountability systems.
In tackling this task, Feinberg says, they «backed into» the five essential tenets of the KIPP model: High Expectations (for academic achievement and conduct); Choice and Commitment (KIPP students, parents, and
teachers all sign a learning pledge,
promising to devote the time and effort needed to succeed); More Time (extended school day, week, and year); Power to Lead (school leaders have significant autonomy, including control over their budget, personnel, and culture); and Focus on Results (scores on standardized
tests and other objective measures are coupled with a focus on character development).
Like NCLB and other previously
promised panaceas, the cost is high - stakes, time - consuming
tests culminating in
teacher dread, parental confusion and some combination of student anxiety for kids who are achievement - motivated and indifference for those who are not.
The U.S. Department of Education will not reverse its decision that Oregon is at «high risk» of failing to use student
test scores to help evaluate
teachers, a step it
promised to take to get out from the most onerous provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Is there always the
promise of better
tests and better - prepared
teachers down the road?
It goes something like this: Step away from federal heavy - handedness around states» accountability and
teacher credentialing systems; keep plenty of transparency of results in place, especially
test scores disaggregated by racial and other subgroups; offer incentives for embracing
promising reforms instead of mandates; and give school districts a lot more flexibility to move their federal dollars around as they see fit.
Lastly, NCLB «s
promise of a substantial increase in student academic achievement has not been materialized, and the law's pressure on
teachers to raise
test scores has backfired into resentment of federal involvement in schooling.
The critics of modern school reform that I know are people who see enormous trouble in the public education system, but don't think it will be fixed by spending billions of dollars on questionable
teacher assessment systems linked to standardized
test scores, or expanding charter schools that are hardly the panacea their early supporters claimed they would be, or handing out federal education dollars based on
promises to change schools according to the likes and dislikes of Education Secretary Arne Duncan, whose record as superintendent of Chicago public schools was hardly distinguished.
The controversial National Council on
Teacher Quality (NCTQ)-- created by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute and funded (in part) by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as «part of a coalition for «a better orchestrated agenda» for accountability, choice, and using test scores to drive the evaluation of teachers» (see here; see also other instances of controversy here and here)-- recently issued yet another report about state's teacher evaluation systems titled: «Running in Place: How New Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.
Teacher Quality (NCTQ)-- created by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute and funded (in part) by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as «part of a coalition for «a better orchestrated agenda» for accountability, choice, and using
test scores to drive the evaluation of
teachers» (see here; see also other instances of controversy here and here)-- recently issued yet another report about state's
teacher evaluation systems titled: «Running in Place: How New Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.
teacher evaluation systems titled: «Running in Place: How New
Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.
Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to
Promises.»
As The Times reported in a front - page story Sunday, some of the school's most
promising teachers lost jobs, and many were replaced by more veteran
teachers who were less effective at raising students»
test scores in math and English.
But Hanna Vaandering, vice president of Oregon's
teachers union, blasted the Obama administration for forcing Oregon to
promise to grade
teachers by
test scores to keep federal schools money flowing.
The EEF and Wellcome are seeking proposals for interventions to improve the retention of science
teachers in secondary schools, with the aim of developing and
testing the most
promising ideas.
The UFT agreed to allow
teachers to be evaluated by student
test data in exchange for a
promise of $ 700 million which has yet to reach city classrooms.
On the other hand, performance - based assessments such as the edTPA provide a
promising approach to reducing reliance on standardized
test scores and the resulting racial disparities among the
teacher workforce.
I addressed the misuse and overuse of standardized
tests, the false
promise of better
tests, how standardized
tests narrow the curriculum, the way CPS and others only pretend to use multiple measures, bias in standardized
tests, the failure of merit pay and other schemes to link
teacher work to student scores, and the likelihood that the new national
tests will be hugely expensive.
Value - added approaches hold great
promise, but there is a need to develop better
tests (and other thoughtful measures of student learning) and better measures of
teacher practice to use along with
test scores, so they are not the sole factor used to evaluate
teacher effectiveness.
When former Gov. Mitch Daniels and then State Superintendent for Public Instruction Tony Bennett pushed a massive overhaul of
teacher evaluation through the legislature in 2011, the
promise was a bold new system that would reward the best
teachers, weed out the worst and for the first time tie pay raises to student
test scores.
The state, which
promised to improve education school accountability in its Race to the Top grant, has since stopped publishing the results in anticipation of the state's new
teacher evaluation process, which will use student
test scores to rate
teachers.
Superintendent Beverly Hall
promised to fire principals who failed to meet
test - score targets, and principals passed that pressure on to
teachers, a state investigative report said.
If Tennessee had the most «growth» of any state on the latest NAEP results led by our state
teachers, why were their
promised salaries a lower priority than unproven PARCC
Testing or adding Media / Marketing and Event Coordinators at the Tennessee Department of Education?
During the campaign, Governor Murphy
promised to withdraw New Jersey from the PARCC assessments and to implement shorter
tests that give
teachers and students actual feedback, to fully fund the state's education aid formula, and to walk back from state takeovers and other top down policies.
The
promising growth in our students» state
test scores over the last three years is a testament to the combined dedication of our
teachers, principals and students.
While the study's report concluded both new
tests hold a lot of
promise for improving
teacher practice and student learning, it pointed to technical, fiscal, and political challenges the two consortia face in bringing their plans to fruition.
With regard to issues specific to education, AFT National president Randi Weingarten celebrated the new federal education law, «Every Student Succeeds Act» (ESSA), and said it
promises to decouple high stakes standardized
tests from
teacher evaluation.
And so I can't help but emit some combination of a chuckle and a groan at the reaction to the SUNY Board of Trustees Charter Schools Committee's decision yesterday to permit charter schools to hire
teachers without the standard year of coursework and
promise to complete a Master's degree but, instead, have 160 hours of instruction in behavior management, lesson planning and other skills; have 40 hours of supervised experience in the field; and pass one exam designed to
test strategies for teaching students with special needs and English learners.
Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber and other state officials, for example,
promised to roll out
teacher and school leader evaluation systems using objective student
test score growth data.
We make grants to the most
promising teams (for - profit and nonprofit) to advance their product roadmaps and
test their solutions with
teachers and students.
Following its initial investigation of the
promises, practices, and pedagogies of maker - centered learning, the AbD research team is now collaborating with a cohort of
teacher - researchers in Oakland, California to
test and develop documentation and assessment strategies for design and maker - centered learning.
Specific provisions included scholarships and loans to students in higher education, with loans to students preparing to be
teachers and to those who showed
promise in the curricular areas of mathematics, science, engineering, and modern foreign languages; grants to states for programs in mathematics, science, and modern foreign languages in public schools; the establishment of centres to expand and improve the teaching of languages; help to graduate students, including fellowships for doctoral students to prepare them to be professors at institutions of higher learning; assistance for the improvement of guidance, counseling, and
testing programs; provisions for research and experimentation in the use of television, radio, motion pictures, and related media for educational purposes; and the improvement of statistical services at the state level.
President Barack Obama entered office with
promises of relief from unrealistic expectations and punitive incentives — only to double down on
testing's importance by favoring value - added
teacher evaluations and to promote privatization through the charter school sector which has increasingly placed portions of our educational commons into hands avoiding public oversight.
Like every other state, we have been
promised that the
tests will have classroom
teachers swimming in a vast vault of data, like Scrooge McDuck on a gold bullion bender.
The state
promised to turn around its poorest performing schools over the course of four years, evaluate
teachers based in part on student
test scores, increase the use of technology in the classroom, and use more rigorous academic standards along with new
tests aligned to those standards.
The Project
PROMISE science curriculum was developed by trained
teachers and field -
tested in three school divisions.