According to the Pembina Institute, a Canadian non-profit think tank that advances clean energy solutions, «95 % of woodland caribou habitat in northeastern Alberta is to be lost in order to
promote oil sands development.»
Not exact matches
The government and the
oil and gas industry have spent lavishly to
promote fossil fuel
development, but a poll for the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers found that only 51 % of us think tar
sands /
oil sands development is worth the environmental risk; 49 % think it isn't.
From a climate policy perspective, the bill can be seen as part of the Conservative ongoing effort to 1) gut environmental assessments and scientific research; 2) attack ENGOs that disagree with government policy to
promote unfettered
development of the
oil sands; and 3) to sideline and even eliminate inconvenient advisory bodies like the National Roundtable on Energy and the Environment.
For example, the Department of Energy was
promoting development of synthetic fuels from coal, tar
sands and
oil shale.
She reports there are about 960 American companies that support Alberta
oil sands activities, with thousands more jobs that could be created if the U.S. would take steps to
promote greater
oil sands development — such as approving the Keystone XL pipeline.