It is beyond serious dispute that the letters sent by Judge Murphy do not
promote public confidence in the judiciary.
Not exact matches
On May 4, the commission found that McCullough failed «to act
in a manner that
promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the
judiciary.»
Rule 1.2 of the code, among other things, provides that «a judge shall act at all times
in a manner that
promotes public confidence in the independence [emphasis added], integrity, and impartiality of the
judiciary.»
The court concluded that the canon «
promotes the State's compelling interests
in preserving the integrity of the
judiciary and maintaining the
public's
confidence in an impartial
judiciary, and that it is narrowly tailored to effectuate those interests.»
A judge shall act at all times
in a manner that
promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the
judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.
A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times
in a manner that
promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the
judiciary.
The duty under Canon 2 to act
in a manner that
promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the
judiciary applies to all the judge's activities, including the discharge of the judge's adjudicative and administrative responsibilities.
Under the Model Code of Judicial Conduct, judges must always act
in a manner that «
promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the
judiciary» and must «avoid impropriety or the appearance of impropriety.»