We also have — at times — been accused of
promoting junk science and on being on the fringe of our professional communities.
Are medical experts
promoting junk science through their courtroom testimony?
Finally, I've known a couple of Nobel Laureates and many other international gurus who accused each other of
promoting junk science, that they had nothing useful to contribute, you stick to astronomy and we will stick to oil generation, you have nothing worthwhile to contribute, he never said that; it's a lie I have the paper here to prove it, let's face it other than physics there are a huge number of things that you know absolutely nothing about, get cycling Otto, shut up!
Why has he tirelessly
promoted the junk science of microstamping in Albany?
The disgusting left wing physcobabble that
promotes this junk science is wasting billions, how many billions is it in the hundreds?
Not exact matches
Not that this this would alter your recommendations about how to eat in order to minimize the risk and / or abate the effects, but I was just wondering if you knew of any evidence to support this idea, or if it might have just been
junk science aimed at
promoting animal - based foods.
You are just another militant group who is using
junk science to
promote a false premisse.
Horner posed for a photo with Marc Morano, Steve Milloy of
Junk Science, and Steven Goddard / Tony Heller at what appeared to be an event
promoting Morano's new book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change, by Regnery Publishing.
When I see people acting concerned about the
science while
promoting far worse
junk science themselves, I will point that out.
Then we have blatent
junk science being
promoted such as this: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/11/26/another-wuwt-tv-segment-engineer-and-aviation-pioneer-burt-rutan-on-why-he-doubts-global-warming/
What most definitely is scandalous is the vile hypocrisy of Soon's harrassment by the warmist establishment, which receives billions every year from the US government, left - wing charities, and billionaire activists like Tom Steyer and George Soros to prop up their bankrupt cause by
promoting exactly the kind of
junk science which Soon (and similarly principled scientists) have made it their business to shred.
Bryan, I'm still waiting for an acknowledgement of the scientific inaccuracy of your previous comments, in which I was accused of
promoting «
junk science» regarding the conditions under which source rocks for oilfields form (as related to the quite relevant and topical issue of reduced thermohaline circulation and bottom water hypoxia).
The saddest part of this, is that those
promoting AGW, whether in ignorance or in knowledge of the
junk science it is, no matter how high up the pecking order they think they are, are just useful dupes for those raking in the real money.
TASSC labeled environmentalists as
promoting «
junk science» while the Coalition advocated what they describe as «sound
science.»