People that believe in gods don't believe in the truth of proof since gods can only exist in the arbitrary mind...
proof means nothing to these people.
Not exact matches
faith goes against science itself; faith
means no
proof, in science without
proof nothing is accepted
to be fact (aka theory) as far as a god, which one?
you sir are practicing a religion one that
means so much
to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not
to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would
mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said
nothing that related
to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of
proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
Today
nothing can be achieved any longer by
means of the traditional location of the concept of God in the gaps of natural science, by
means of the assertion that the concept of God is necessary
to explain the world, by
means of any transformation of the world by theistic
proofs.
I think that baby
proofing allows, what I found is that baby
proofing allows parents
to have things that really are no's
to become no's and that the things that aren't, that don't need
to be no's on a daily basis or an hourly basis can not be no's because everything becomes a no and no
means absolutely
nothing.
Is importing adoptable dogs with faked rabies certificates just a politically correct mistake by well
meaning Americans or is it
proof that some people will stop at
nothing to turn a profit?
I understand that for the sake of insurance rates these ratios
mean nothing and the numbers you cited are what matters, but if you're using these skewed numbers as «
proof» that men are worse drivers then you need
to do a lot more Math.