And you are saying I can't see a cliff so I am going to keep walking until I have
proof of a cliff.
Not exact matches
As a (poor) analogy, arguing whether or not it's human - caused feels a bit like planning to develop real estate on a seaside clifftop which some specialists have said might suffer dangerous erosion in the next 70 years unless you put up some seawalls to prevent water action at the base
of the
cliff - and basing your view whether to build seawalls and other erosion defences upon whether or not there's
proof that human activity would be the cause
of any future erosion, rather than whether or not erosion is likely and if so how harmful it might be to your interests if nothing is done to reduce it.
If you sense endless possibilities from a merger, you'll
cliff - dive right in — even if you have no tangible
proof of concept (and have known each other for like, a week).
If you want
proof that the south coast
of England was once connected to the northern coast
of France, it's here by the millions
of tons — 100ft - high chalk
cliffs, miles
of them, that match those at Dover.