Sentences with phrase «proof of a court order»

While having proof of a court order can't make the bank back off pursuing your obligations, it's still good to have the documentation if you seek other legal action.

Not exact matches

Please be advised that in accordance with the Order Amending the Claims Procedure Order granted October 30, 2015, if the Monitor intends to revise or reject a Claim, the Monitor shall notify the Claimant who has delivered such Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim, as applicable, that such Claim has been revised or rejected and the reasons therefor, by sending a Notice of Revision or Disallowance by no later than December 15, 2015, unless otherwise ordered by the Court on application by the Monitor.

On June 11, 2015, the Court issued an order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 2015.

That order was contested at a hearing on May 13, 2014 [court transcripts available], and that restraining was dismissed and vacated for lacking evidence and not meeting the legal burden of proof [Hennepin County Case # 27 - CO-13-8209, filed May 16, 2014].

To arrogate to itself the powers to simply dump people in jail indefinitely is, to say the least, uncivilized and barbaric; to hang serious allegations against a person without proof of evidence, as the judge noted in the case of Senator Bala Mohammed, is malicious, callous and unacceptable; and to constrain citizens with brazen impunity, in defiance of court orders, is to send a wrong signal to Diaspora Nigerians and other foreign investors who, paradoxically, our President and his ministers, have been courting assiduously, that the law can not protect both they and their investments.

However, on May 5 this year, the Supreme Court in a case filed by Abu Ramadan and Evans Nimako ordered the EC to remove from Ghana's current voter's register, the names of over 56,000 people who used NHIS cards as proof to register and voted in the 2012 elections.

The flagbearer of the All People's Party (APC), Hassan Ayariga, has welcomed a High Court order to the Electoral Commission to allow him correct errors on his nomination forms describing the judgment as proof that the nation's democracy is working.

The Supreme Court has ordered the Electoral Commission to expunge from the current voters» register the names of all persons who registered and voted in the 2012 elections, with the National Health Insurance card as a proof of identity.

Provide divorce decree / court order stating amount, as well as, proof of receipt of funds for last year

Such animal shall be humanely destroyed unless a judge of a court of competent jurisdiction orders its release or the owner provides adequate proof to the animal control officer that such licensed dog shall no longer reside in the city.

[13]... the Court must answer the narrow question of whether it is strictly necessary, in order to support a finding of legally compensable mental injury, for a claimant to adduce expert evidence or other proof of a recognized psychiatric illness.

All the enforcing court needs is proof of the foreign order; its own legal mechanisms take over from there.

The burden of proof is beyond reasonable doubt and insurers will need very convincing evidence to justify the expense and risk of pursuing contempt of court proceedings — as most of the contempt allegations were rejected, Kirk was only ordered to pay 50 % of the defendant's costs.

On April 18, U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson held Kobach in civil contempt of court for failing to follow court orders after she barred enforcement of the proof of citizenship law.

And within 10 working days: of a court receiving a letter, you will get a reply written to you or by telephone; of a judge's order, you will get a copy sent to you; of the court receiving a request for cancellation of a registered judgment — paid within one month — with proof from the claimant of payment, a certificate of cancellation will be sent out; and of the court receiving a request for a warrant of execution with the fee, the warrant will be sent to a bailiff — and the court will ensure that the bailiff makes a visit within 15 working days from the warrant being sent out.

If your name on the child's birth certificate, adoption certificate, or guardianship documents does not match the current name on your passport, bring a notarized copy of the proof of name change (such as a court order or marriage license).

(Order, p. 30, citing Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40, 44 (1981)-RRB- In Hudson the court also held that «a reversal due to failure of proof at trial, where the State received a fair opportunity to offer whatever proof it could assemble, bars retrial on the same charge.»

As the Court of Appeal wrote, «the proof is in the pudding» — counsel for one of the Respondents calculated the lowest intermediate balance for each beneficiary (and the proportion each balance comprised) to the satisfaction of the Chambers Judge who signed the Order.

Since child support can be ordered retroactively for up to 24 months in an initial child support case, the court can consider proof of child support paid by one parent to the other and typically the court will give a credit to the paying spouse for the amount of child support paid against the child support arrearage owed.

She is now precluded from instituting any new action of any nature or court proceeding of any nature in any court in Ontario, including small claims court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to court proceeding of any nature in any court in Ontario, including small claims court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to court in Ontario, including small claims court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to court, and she is precluded from bringing any further or fresh step in any existing action without the consent of a Superior Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to Court judge, which consent will only be granted after the plaintiff makes an application for it, and provides proof that she has paid $ 40,000 of the more than $ 50,000 in cost orders that have been made against her to date.

Playing uncivil, tactical, inappropriate, old - school, trial by ambush games like: threatening to require proof of obviously valid records, holding back important documents until the last second, failing to fulfil undertakings until the eve of trial, delivering new expert's reports during the trial, saying untrue things to counsel opposite (whether knowingly or not), failing to prepare examinations in advance to «wing it» at trial, refusing to agree to the admissibility of relevant documents while requiring changes to be made to irrelevant ones, refusing to share costs of joint expenses, refusing to cooperate on court ordered process matters, are all wrongful.

It was held by the Court of Appeal that the Judge should have made an order for return pending the father obtaining proof that the mother and children would be sufficiently accommodated, as well as injunctive orders being obtained in advance.

The court upheld all the first instance decisions on the issue of whether and in what circumstances the court can depart from the RPI, set by the Damages Act 1996 (DA 1996), s 2 (8), when inflation - proofing a periodical payments order in a personal injury claim that features a claim for future loss.

After the order is served, proof of service must be filed with the court.

The burden of proof is the threshold that a party seeking to prove a fact in court must reach in order to have that fact legally established.

courts should resolve the controversies before them and make an order which is permanent subject only to change under s. 17 on proof of a change of circumstances.»

Citing a previous Attorney General opinion, the Court of Appeals noted «If, however, an alleged contemnor is not personally served with the rule to show cause, the family court may, pursuant to the provisions of section 20-7-870 [now § 63-17-390], use the scheduled court time to conduct a hearing to determine whether there is «competent proof» of disobedience of the court oCourt of Appeals noted «If, however, an alleged contemnor is not personally served with the rule to show cause, the family court may, pursuant to the provisions of section 20-7-870 [now § 63-17-390], use the scheduled court time to conduct a hearing to determine whether there is «competent proof» of disobedience of the court ocourt may, pursuant to the provisions of section 20-7-870 [now § 63-17-390], use the scheduled court time to conduct a hearing to determine whether there is «competent proof» of disobedience of the court ocourt time to conduct a hearing to determine whether there is «competent proof» of disobedience of the court ocourt order.

One of the key aspects of the appeals court's conclusion was resolving which level of proof is required in order for a plaintiff like this manager to be entitled to a mixed - motive jury instruction in an FMLA retaliation case.

The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Cunningham, discussed CR 43.02 relating to the order of proof at trial, and noted that a trial court has discretion to regulate the order of presentation of proof at tCourt, in an opinion by Justice Cunningham, discussed CR 43.02 relating to the order of proof at trial, and noted that a trial court has discretion to regulate the order of presentation of proof at tcourt has discretion to regulate the order of presentation of proof at trial.

The appeal court office will require you to show proof of service on the prosecutor's office in order for you to file your Notice of Appeal.

Comment: Some commenters argued that, while a court order should be required, the standard of proof should be something other than «probable cause.»

Finally, court orders and separation agreements are recognized by financial institutions; if you are applying for credit or loans, these documents provide proof of income if you are a support recipient.

Ideally, you and your child will be travelling with either the written consent of the other parent, or with proof of court - ordered entitlement.

In 2014, Weil won a significant victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that affirmed the trial court's Daubert and summary judgment orders in the lead case, which excluded plaintiffs» expert testimony and resultantly found that plaintiffs could not sustain their burden of pCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that affirmed the trial court's Daubert and summary judgment orders in the lead case, which excluded plaintiffs» expert testimony and resultantly found that plaintiffs could not sustain their burden of pcourt's Daubert and summary judgment orders in the lead case, which excluded plaintiffs» expert testimony and resultantly found that plaintiffs could not sustain their burden of proof.

Thus the Court was not asked to determine the validity of their prior agreement, but rather simply granted the order that Mr. N.D. requested: that the embryos «be destroyed in a manner acceptable to K.D.» and that she be required to provide proof that the embryos have been destroyed.

If you do not have proper insurance identification at the time of the accident, you will need to go to court in order to present proof of insurance to them.

However, if you lived in another state and received a court order to purchase SR22 insurance as a proof of financial responsibility, you are still required to keep it for the specified period, even if you are in Massachusetts.

You should keep your certificate as proof of your compliance with the court order to attend the Kids First Class.

a.The obligor fails to provide written proof to the obligee within 30 days after receiving effective notice of the court order that the health insurance has been obtained or that application for health insurance has been made;

This means that you must follow the instructions very carefully, file all mandatory documents, provide proof of all requirements, move the court to order the other party to fulfill his / her requirements (when necessary), request a hearing or trial date, etc..

A parent has the presumed right to visitation with their child, in the absence of certain circumstances, such as proof of physical or emotional abuse by that parent or of mental instability, which would cause a court to either order supervised visitation or none at all.

In some states, such as North Carolina, courts are required to terminate alimony, if established by court order, upon the paying spouse's proof of cohabitation by the receiving spouse.

The non-custodial parent has the burden of proof to convince the court that the children would do better if the court ordered them to move to his home.

If the court wants more evidence than your documented proof, Virginia law allows judges to order a guardian ad litem or court - appointed special advocate to meet with you, your child, your ex-spouse and anyone else with knowledge of the situation.

If there has been no other case involving you at the Family Court registry in which your Application for Consent Orders is to be filed you must also file a copy of the certificate of registration of de facto relationship or other proof (if you were a party to a de facto relationship which is registered under a prescribed law of a state or territory and are seeking financial or de facto partner maintenance orOrders is to be filed you must also file a copy of the certificate of registration of de facto relationship or other proof (if you were a party to a de facto relationship which is registered under a prescribed law of a state or territory and are seeking financial or de facto partner maintenance ordersorders).

Download additional forms you need from the California Courts website or from a third - party legal document service: a Responsive Declaration to an Order to Show Cause or Notice of Motion and a Proof of Service of Summons form.

Parents can walk into a court room and request a restraining order that will not only kick you out of your own home, but deny you the right to see your children, all with no proof, and you don't even get the chance to defend yourself until an order has already been written.

You'll also want to know if the order is temporary or hinges on the completion of other court - ordered requirements, such as proof of participation in specific classes or the completion of a court - approved alcohol treatment.

Nearly all Colorado judicial districts now require proof of parents» completion of parenting education classes, as a prerequisite to domestic relations court orders (especially decrees of dissolution of marriage or of legal separation).

The court also found no proof that Dean and the company had violated consumer fraud laws or schemed to perform an inadequate test of the septic system in order to close the transaction quickly.