Sentences with phrase «proof of anything but»

Unless they are having delusions and not wanting proof of anything but only believe what other people tell them.

if you base your life on nothing but a thought (faith)-- a dream — really its more of a hope because the only «proof» is after you die — so there really isn't any proof of anything but a load of people telling others they are wrong and going to a place of torture because THEY think its real or vice versa!

Emotions are not proof of anything but that you feel emotions.

Love is not proof of anything but that you feel it.

Not exact matches

Stone, in an email to CNBC, called the lawsuit a «left - wing conspiracy» that «strings together events they find suspicious based on partisan worldview but has NO proof of hacking never mind anything else.»

But they also failed to provide any compelling proof they had a hacked movie — whether it's «Star Wars,» «Pirates of the Caribbean,» or anything else.

I am not sure that what happened last week is proof of anything I've been saying, but I do think that the framework I have used over the past decade has been useful, at least to me, in understanding both the rebalancing process in China and the events that led up to the global crisis of 2007 - 08.

You have no proof that the bible is anything but a book of bronze age fables.

But lack of proof that nobody comes back from anything does not necessarily validate your «reality».

How do you know god commands anything when there is no proof that this god said anything but plenty of proof that man did?

«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anythibut is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anythiBut thats not proof of anything.

It may not be scientific proof of anything, but it is proof of something of meaning, of psychologicaly use, to that individual.

You said, «But there can be proof of God just like there can be proof of anything.»

The burden of proof is then shifted from the theory of creationism to the atheist, because the atheist is the one denouncing the possibility, without providing anything but concepts that are in contrast to their own beliefs, that creationism could have occurred.

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

Dispute the proofs all you want, but pretending they don't exist - or that logic isn't «evidence» of anything - shows more that you're partisan and dogmatic than reflective and intelligent.

The popularity of Allen Ginsberg is often cited as proof that anything goes if you're a poet these days, but there are still many who despise him and his kind.

Maybe we do not need to child - proof anything anymore, but we need to take steps in practicing child - likeness, and that means we step away from the adulting we so often convince ourselves we need to do every day of the week.

When I ask you what type of proof you require, your answer is to define what you will NOT accept as proof (anything having to do with human invention, testimony, etc.), but when it comes to what you WILL accept as proof your response is «God should know exactly what would work for me.»

* i've only ever used vodka for this, but you can also experiment with other types of liquor (anything at least 70 proof) to get slightly different flavors of extract!

When we studied some of these reports, we found an amazing number of weasel words but no real proof of anything.

The spiking walk rate is worrisome, but it doesn't have to be proof of anything.

Not to take anything away from Sanchez but one the genius of Wenger and his wengerball system is that it makes some player look better than they really are, fabregas, nasri, hleb etc are perfect example if you need proof.

I know that a lot of natural mamas love these and swear by them, but children have actually died from using them, and there's zero scientific proof that they actually do anything.

Based on lack of prosecution, I don't think anything is known to be provably illegal (not a conclusive proof, admittedly, but a good indicator.

The paper was then accepted — without any further problems — but the experience taught me that it is probably impossible to provide 100 % proof of anything.

So I think Donald Olson has, I mean, you know, it's not proof; I can't really prove anything along, you know, when you're doing this kind of thing, but it's pretty good; it's not a bad argument.

But if Steve Jobs is proof of anything, it's that these techtonic behind - the - scenes shifts can ultimately lead to massive critical success.

You got ta make sure you get all your paperwork done correctly and make sure you have proof that that's full and final settlement but in a lot of cases, creditors are going to take that deal because they can't get anything else anyway and I guess that kind of loops back to our discussion about debt settlements earlier.

My 3 year old female is one of the «bomb proof» type, isn't bothered by (or with) most humans, very independent, not so * obedient * (not food motivated, or toy motivated, or really motivated to do anything she doesn't want to do) but I can usually trust her to make good choices.

Once, not all that long ago, artists could establish their dissidence through the innovative originality of their work, but the avant - garde strategy of rupture, the creation of an iconoclastic artwork, has become so thoroughly assimilated as to no longer serve as proof of anything more than that the artist is a good student.

[Response: There are websites devoted to showing the moon landings were faked as well, but that is hardly proof of anything.

This is not to prejudge whether the data will prove one side right or wrong but no one can claim to have proved anything so long as any part of what they assert as proof is opaque.

Insightful maybe; but not proof of anything.

Though of course the word «proof» is a subjective one in itself, the degree to which anything can be proven, but i think it's apt for this discussion - especially when commenting on the IPCC!

It would seem perverse were this effect to cause cooling, but «would seem» is not standard of proof, I just can't see how a thoughtful person can say anything other than it is more likely than not that AGW is happening.

Where indeed is there any proof that tree rings analysis can be anything other than an indicator of what's good for trees, temperature being but one of many factors.

A few years ago, when I was first launched into becoming the amateur investigator of what's up with whatsupwiththat, and the flood of really well crafted (certainly not done by ignorant people) anonymous emails conveying little known proof of Obama's secret Islamitude, and other lies that would damage Rush Limbaugh's reputation if he were to personally deliver them... Ah Say, Ah Say (Foghorn Leghorn accent) when I was first launched into all that, from reading prodigious comment - storms in many places, including judithcurry.com, but also invading more liberal venues, I concluded what we have here is less a movement for anything, than a massively stroked and stoked «Great Liberal Hating and Baiting Cult», with a very big self - organizing component, but definitely nourished in all sorts of ways by the folks you can read about in Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right by Jane Meyer (best book yet of its class and I've read many).

[Let me be the first to say that this is no proof of anything; but I think it is interesting nonetheless.]

But when you pick up threads and only show them as proving no AGW and have not done anything like as much checking of those facts as you demand from the pro AGW proofs, you aren't being skeptical, you're denying AGW.

This could have been photoshopped, so it's not really a proof of anything, but if it's a photoshop job, it's pretty good and matches the official teaser photo of the Model S.

I'm posting it because I think it's clever and funny, but let's not read too much into it; I know it's no proof of anything.

No offense, but I'm not seeing any earth shattering proof of anything on this graph.

Proof of fame: she can pick whatever career highlight she wants, but it's doubtful that anything would top an appearance on Space Ghost Coast to Coast.

Anything from major surgery, to therapeutic massage, to the mileage it takes to get there could be recovered, but only if you can provide proof of the expense and its relationship to the injury.

You will receive a Proof of Completion (receipt) for your records, but your completion will automatically be reported to the court electronically so no need to do anything more!

«The report talks about some proofs - of - concept in SWIFT Innovation Labs but does not describe what they are in enough detail for me to say anything sensible about them,» Birch told CoinDesk.

But without proof of work, is there anything really new about blockchains?