Getting one's license is
no proof of anything other than the student can memorize enough stuff on a short - term basis to answer some questions correctly.
The source is from Purena and the writing seems to be on Purinas side not showing
any proof of anything other than he said she said.
While it is true that very suggestive metaphysical arguments can be drawn from the reality of form, the intelligibility of the universe, consciousness, the laws of physics, or (most importantly) ontological contingency, the mere biological complexity of this or that organism can never amount to an irrefutable
proof of anything other than the incalculable complexity of that organism's phylogenic antecedents.
As if it was
proof of anything other than an individuals belief.
Not exact matches
As for the one god being more valid than any
of the
other thousands, that things you attribute to him (technically to Jesus), still haven't been proven in
anything outside
of the bible, which no one
of a scientific mind can accept as convincing
proof.
Freethinker, you are just upset that you have zero
proof of anything you say
other than a book that spends the first half scaring the s ** t out
of everyone, and then the second half changing its message.
if you base your life on nothing but a thought (faith)-- a dream — really its more
of a hope because the only «
proof» is after you die — so there really isn't any
proof of anything but a load
of people telling
others they are wrong and going to a place
of torture because THEY think its real or vice versa!
You didn't answer my questions or prove
anything with your statements
other than you have no understanding or concept
of faith in God and you're spending most
of your time looking for
proof that God does not exist.
Unless they are having delusions and not wanting
proof of anything but only believe what
other people tell them.
After the pattern set by Isaiah, Jesus, Joel, and Pentecost, the burden
of proof is on anyone who claims that Luke means
anything other than foreign languages.
If this were
anything else, like claims
of harnessing cold fusion, where all
other attempts were utter failures wouldn't you want
proof that they actually found what they claim?
* i've only ever used vodka for this, but you can also experiment with
other types
of liquor (
anything at least 70
proof) to get slightly different flavors
of extract!
even though there is no
proof of him personally taking any money out
of the club they would have to declare it under these new financial regulations that have come in, any and all monies going out
of the club has to be put in black and white on the accounts and i didn't see that kronke has taken
anything when i read them the
other day.
At first, you may think that burgundy doesn't go with a whole lot
of other colors... Well, I've got
proof that it goes with basically
anything you throw at it!
We've had some shelter dogs over the years that were just so amazingly good with
other dogs — trust with your life, bomb -
proof, able to negotiate virtually
anything — those dogs, I wouldn't dream
of intervening with short
of blood, since they could and did give master classes in canine social signaling.
It is rare that one paper can be pointed to as
proof of anything — most papers are bricks in the wall, albeit some bricks are more important than
others.
As I recall I said (citing the source) 8 cm for forty years (which I don't recall characterizing as «dramatic» or much
of anything at all
other than
proof of Rocks» error).
It would seem perverse were this effect to cause cooling, but «would seem» is not standard
of proof, I just can't see how a thoughtful person can say
anything other than it is more likely than not that AGW is happening.
Like many
other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as
proof of the dire consequences
of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have
anything to do with increased CO2 levels.
Where indeed is there any
proof that tree rings analysis can be
anything other than an indicator
of what's good for trees, temperature being but one
of many factors.
A few years ago, when I was first launched into becoming the amateur investigator
of what's up with whatsupwiththat, and the flood
of really well crafted (certainly not done by ignorant people) anonymous emails conveying little known
proof of Obama's secret Islamitude, and
other lies that would damage Rush Limbaugh's reputation if he were to personally deliver them... Ah Say, Ah Say (Foghorn Leghorn accent) when I was first launched into all that, from reading prodigious comment - storms in many places, including judithcurry.com, but also invading more liberal venues, I concluded what we have here is less a movement for
anything, than a massively stroked and stoked «Great Liberal Hating and Baiting Cult», with a very big self - organizing component, but definitely nourished in all sorts
of ways by the folks you can read about in Dark Money: The Hidden History
of the Billionaires Behind the Rise
of the Radical Right by Jane Meyer (best book yet
of its class and I've read many).
Other new features include Gigabit LTE support, allowing for data transfer speeds
of up to 1.2 GB / s, though this is more future -
proofing the smartphone than
anything else.
The
proof is in the eating
of the pudding; there must be a reason why bureaucrats choose to work within the safety
of the unionized silly service government bureaucracy environment, and it is this... no need to stand out... to be different... to challenge
others in order to make one's mark in life, to risk
anything other than being seen leaving work early on Friday afternoons.