Sentences with phrase «proof of the existence»

Some projects I participated in are Proof of Existence, bitcore, and Streamium.

Marion eschews an approach to God by way of deductive proofs of the existence and of the names of God, and searches in St. Augustine for a way that passes through our most intimate religious existence.

you can't have absolute science that demands a logical and tangible cause (which no one has the right answer for because no one lived millions of years ago) and then also believe that God exists though you have never seen proof of His existence.

Proof of the existence of people written of in the NT.

«The experiences of others» is particularly tricky, why does God present proof of his existence to some, but not others?

â $ œIt would seem unfair for God to present proof of His existence only to some and then judge the rest for not believing.

It would seem unfair for God to present proof of His existence only to some and then judge the rest for not believing.

That's proof of its existence.

Loving one another (family specifically) unconditionally and teaching love by example is far more of a noble focus than spending much of our time obsessing over and trying to please a god whom there is zero proof of existence.

Sure it can fred... it can be argued that your god can not give verifiable proof of his existence and therefore it would unreasonable, illogical and fallacious to do as you do and assume the conclusion.

Now, hypothetically, if you personally maintained belief in a supreme being (one in which you had no verifiable proof of its existence, but yet what you considered ample evidence to place your faith in) and that being had communicated morality in absolute terms, would you define that morality as subjective or objective?

It was written by many people over the span of hundreds of years, it is tribal rules from the infancy of our development and arguably is not a good book at all but full of hatred, spite and unspeakable violence, and you arent allowed to use «faith» as your proof of existence... faith is nothing less than the throwing away of reason i.e. belief without evidence.

But amazingly the fact that some said it rested on the back of a turtle did not make it fact, as I was pointing out, just arguing about God's existence is not proof of that existence.

Therefore you can not get a physical proof of his existence from within the system.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

That is your first mistake because you can not provide me with a reasonable explanation for a divine creators existence) and the fact that we exist is not anymore a reason for the proof of the existence of an anthropomorphic god than it proves the existence of, in Richard Dawkins terms, the flying spaghetti monste.

I don't hate things that have no proof of existence.

So your god is arbitrarily damning people by denying them access to proof of his existence?

As for proof of His existence, you'll never get any.

You probably don't know this, but according to your book of myths, god does show proof of his existence upon request.

If there is truly a proof of the existence of God, why should it not be offered once for all in an irrefutable form?

Ben... if you have evidential proof of the existence of your god, by all means, present it.

No one argument formulated from any set of premises can constitute a proof of the existence of God in the usual sense.

The conclusive proof of the existence and more importantly the effects of the widespread breakdown of parental responsibility (even where there were two parents) and also of the catastrophic consequences of the encouragement of lone parenting, was described in detail on the front page of The Times newspaper of Saturday August 13.

My stance on a supernatural deity is that I have no proof of the existence of one, but that doesn't mean one could not exist.

For me, it was proof of the existence of God.

Music can inspire glimpses of glory, the proof of the existence of God.

To make claims of knowledge regarding actions and desires of your god without providing proof of existence is illogical and childlike.

Eric — no one can offer you proof of the existence of God or in other foundational beliefs.

to igaftr, below is a post to explain that the proof or evidence of a scientific proof of the existence of God (Him) is forthcoming.find my name

If you were to present a proof of the existence of God you'd be the first to do so.

I wish God (whichever one) would email me proof of his existence... Although it would probably be put in my spam folder

Now, a symbol is a proof of the existence of an absent object.

neved «to igaftr, below is a post to explain that the proof or evidence of a scientific proof of the existence of God (Him) is forthcoming.find my name»

Paul Stufflebeam — you seem to believe that you have proof of the existence of god.

There is ZERO proof of his existence.

This does not rule out the existence of a god or gods, of course, but certainly offers no proof of their existence either.

If you don't believe in a God who refuses to establish irrefutable proof of his existence, then he will send you to hell forever.

@Observer: If you don't believe in a God who refuses to establish irrefutable proof of his existence, then he will send you to hell forever.

As a guide to how the universe works, or as proof of the existence of God, it is useless.

- «Based on what he knows at this point, Griffin [Robert Griffin, an ancient Egyptian history scholar at the University of Memphis] said he would hesitate to say the artifacts are definitive proof of the existence of Joseph in Egypt.»

I enjoy these articles b / c they provide entertaining proof of the existence of idiots (the religious).

I have my own proof of his existence and religion isn't the answer.

In that proof of the existence or non-existence of God in unattainable, at some point in time common sense must be factored into the equation.

You did not answer the challenge — you have not provided any proof of the existence of god.

Perhaps one fears getting to know anything of the implicit proof of the existence of evil in the world.

Your posts are actually supporting Ryan's statement about atheists requiring proof of existence.

Tarring a group of people who have not been given proof of the existence of a God or Gods (depending on your chosen «Faith») or of the ability of prayer to alter anything is not terribly helpful.

Ibn Sina also makes use of the Aristotelian distinction between necessity and contingency, but goes far beyond what Aristotle has said in the subject, both in his proof of the existence of God and in his explanation of the relation between God and the universe.

He works hard to find a proof of the existence of God that concurs with the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.