Sentences with phrase «proof of your accusations»

You call me names, and accuse me, and when I ask for your proof of those accusations, you run and hide.

More lies with no proof of your accusations.

You have no proof of your accusations or your claims of tiny percentages.

actually, when making an accusation of any sort... it is always wise to provide proof of the accusation you are making.

I'd like to see the proof of these accusations.

I am asking for proof of these accusations, evidence that these things are happening the way you and Judith describe.

Not exact matches

The Obama administration advised schools to respond more quickly to accusations and to lower the amount of proof needed to reach a decision.

Since when is it fair and reasonable for people to throw out accusations that ruins the integrity of others without providing proof.

It is very easy to throw out accusations and claims here without the burden of proof.

The issue haunted Francis after he told a Chilean journalist during his visit that the accusations against Bishop Barros were «slander» and that he would only speak out if he had «proof» of wrongdoing.

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

Actually, the burdon of proof falls solely on the one making the accusation... in this instance it is Con Men, Reality and Fenton.

You are, like many others, an ignorant person who feels that proof or logic is no necessary to make accusations of any kind.

@Trilarion The burden of proof is on the people who make the accusation.

My point is, and remains, in a situation where the stakes are as high as «ruined life», it's more than reasonable to be skeptical of accusations without some form of strong proof.

The accusations of bias against the fight against corruption are increasing by the day and critics easily find ready examples to argue that the fight is only cosmetic and showy and government is only making do with a few symbolic gestures as proof that it is serious.

The 10 - term senator from Syracuse kept the piles of accusations and actuarial estimates as proof of how ludicrous he thought it was for so many state leaders, union officials and local news outlets to take Destiny USA developer Robert Congel's word that Carousel Center mall would become a vacation destination with a hotel tower, an indoor Erie Canal and a renewable energy research park.

When the Post's Fred Dicker demanded proof — not an unreasonable request for someone lobbing such shocking accusations — Paladino claimed that «of course» he had it and it would be forthcoming «at the appropriate time.»

And the complete, accumulated record will provide not only proof of the offense but defense against accusations of collusion should the woman make a formal complaint.

Where would the proof be of your latest wild accusation?

Odd, though, there's been no real proof of that latter accusation.

So, have they actually got any proof that this is a truthful accusation and not just some money - savvy girl attempting to make a load of cash off someone that presumably has his fair share of it?

Actually no, Robert - the burden of proof is on those making the accusation to provide the evidence to support said accusation.

And you show no concern whatsoever that this famous bit of «smoking gun» evidence is literally never seen in any accusers» books, magazine articles, PPT presentations, or web sites that rely on it as proof for their accusation that skeptic scientists are untrustworthy?

``... And you show no concern whatsoever that this famous bit of «smoking gun» evidence is never seen in any accuser's books, magazine qrticles, PPT presentations or websites that RELY ON IT AS PROOF for their accusation that skeptic scientists are untrustworthy?»

When nothing about the «corrupt skeptic scientists» accusation lines up right, and nobody repeating it offers proof that such a situation actually exists, how does more than two decades of repetition of the accusation avoid the following definition?

the practice of making accusations of disloyalty, especially of pro-Communist activity, in many instances unsupported by proof or based on slight, doubtful, or irrelevant evidence.

Proof of this, is there were 3 accusations that Watts Up was a «d3nier» blog funded by the Koch nrothers, I reported this, and the moderators have removed them, as they usually do..

* One of the major roles of an Anchorage criminal defense attorney is to present arguments and proofs in the court of law to defend his / her client against criminal accusations.

Famous people have to meet that burden of proof because there are accusations made against them that are not true all the time and not always for actual crimes (Ted Cruz was accused of being the Zodiac Killer during the election (mostly as humor).

It is beneficial to demonstrate to the court the parent making the false accusations is doing so willfully and without proof of any child abuse or neglect.

Although the concept of scientific proof may be of importance in such fields as chemistry, physics, and biology, the concept is not as applicable in the field of psychology; especially with regard to issues being dealt with in such areas as child - custody disputes, and sex - abuse accusations.