Sentences with phrase «proof on you atheists»

There is no burned of proof on Atheists, it is on Theists.

I place the burden of proof on you atheists.

Not exact matches

Most Atheists would argue that they do not fall into either of those definitions, as they reject religion and they generally demand that belief is based on proof.

What I think Jerry was hoping for was that the Atheists here stop reacting in a reactionary sort of way and start stating their position on their own two feet; in other words, come up with proof of their claim «there is no god».

on the topic of proof — we atheists need not prove the lack of existence of something that has no impact on our daily lives, however those that believe based purely on the idea of somethings existence is a bit disconcerting!

The burden of proof is on the atheist to explain how everything in our universe is ordered.

The proof does not fall on us Atheists... the burden of proof falls on the people making the claim.

So the burden on proof is not the atheist to Disprove your claim, the burden of proof is on the person claiming there is a god to demonstrate its validity... unfortunately this has not ever been done, so atheists reject the claim and reserve judgement and belief till evidence surfaces.

God's proof exists if faith, not the scientific testing that the internet atheists posting on a faith and belief blog demand.

They then try to show to the atheists proofs for the existence of God based on reason alone, so they claim.

You're on the wrong thread again tommie and by the way you add more proof to the Truth of so called atheists being liars than any other self deluded atheist on these blogs.

Until someone can create a single bit of matter and a single living cell, out of nothing, the onus / burden of proof is on atheists!

You are proof that atheists haven't cornered the market on critical thinking skills.

Most «atheists» are actually closer to agnostics, rational, scientifically minded people who will not believe based on faith but proof; those that arent are generally teenagers trying to rebel and not even doing self - examination and soul - searching.

Instead they (atheists) simply don't believe any of the god claims that have been put forth (this requires no proof on their part), and * may * claim that they are convinced some god concepts that have been presented to them do not exist (this requires supporting argument).»

On the one hand, it's really easy to be an atheist since there is not one shred of proof that god does exist.

I think the burden is on you to show us Atheists the proof.

GAW: There is no such thing as a true atheist... What you can't take with you after this life, and the faith therein is proof enough for me and good enough reason for anyone's conversion, even yours, on your last day.

«Neither the believers, nor the atheists which are basically on opposite ends of the spectrum have «any» solid and undeniable - «absolute» proof either way.

As one commentator pointed out, many atheists base their beliefs on the absence of proof.

Therefore the burden of proof for God is on the Theist, not the Atheist.

I hope you have proof of your assertions that atheists revert to religion on their deathbed.

It's what I hate is that when Atheists deny the existence of God, yet have done no research on the proof itself.

that's not the way they taught it when I was in school... the story then was we evolved from apes... you have to keep changing it cause the lie don't fit the proof... the skin on my body heals not evolves... are you sure atheists are as smart as you all say.

You see, we atheists have this thing about requiring proof before blindly accepting what — on the surface at least — sound like ridiculous claims.

Theists are given the burden of proof and no responsibility is taken by the atheist for the implications their non-belief has on philosophy and their worldview.

Which probably explains why many atheists are attracted to science: most of us were raised in a religious environment, and rather than proving the religion's hypothesis, we instead gathered proof and then when we got a different result than the Church taught, we said «hang on a second...» We're naturally inclined towards empirical Methodology.

I have read a number of comments on here demanding proof of God from Atheists.

Also, it sort of invalidates your comment about feeling sorry for atheists when 1) you are also on this blog so you have about as much of a stake in this as any atheist here and 2) if agitating christian ranks only takes asking for proof and debating religion in a coherent matter, christian foundation must be pretty shaky indeed.

Believers, have a point when they say that agnostics / atheists don't know anything either, but some would rather disbelieve something on the basis that their is no proof rather than believing something on the basis that you can't prove otherwise.

On the atheist side, undeniable scientific proof of the big bang theory and evolution do not disprove the existence of God.

Maybe he's busy getting his beliefs strengthened as his local house of stupidity, errrr, worship... Maybe he's busy praying to his imaginary friend, asking it to stop those pesky atheists from asking simple questions he can't answer... Maybe he's huddling with the likes of Adelina, HeavenScent and the rest of that ilk on the ultimate proof of their god (s)... Maybe He's realized the only way not to look like an even bigger fool is to remain silent...

That people in foxholes or on deathbeds are never atheists is not proof that god exists, it's exactly the opposite — proof that belief in god is utiliatarian — a balm for the weak mind.

Yes, and actually the burden of proof is on the believer regardless of how the atheist, agnostic or person of faith feels about it.

Oh, and before you start in on the Atheists» opposite view of your own by askling us for proof, you'll need to provide all your research and evidence so as to give us a working baseline.

Atheists don't all see religion the same way, but many resent the fact that religious believers have imposed their religious beliefs on others despite the fact that none of them have any proof that what they believe is correct.

Everything around you shows proof of intelligent design, while atheists holds on to these empty theories.

You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you, it isn't on Atheists to prove you wrong.

To harp that the burden of proof is on the atheist (even though it's foolish in of itself) and then refuse to accept proof provided is super disingenuous, even for you.

Proof that satan's lies worked on the atheists.

By contrast, Atheists do not seek to punish people for their ideas on how the world works, but rather to let people know that their belief system is flawed; that the burden of proof is not on their side.

Also I would love to see all these Atheists «forcing their religion on the rest of us» You know like creating laws to limit your rights, creating groups to silence and limit the freedoms and expressions simply because they believe didn't from you, that thing we call evidence and proof, can you provide any?

There is no solid proof for believing or not, but I think the Atheists have science on their side, and that's more than what religion has.

I got Richard Dawkins» BBC documentaries on DVD from a colleague, as «proof» of how the atheists and humanists are attacking christianity and how some are hoping to eliminate it.

If atheists could just admit their position comes from faith, without proof, and based on hope (not critical thinking), we could progress to more interesting questions.

Nii - Don't waste your time with the Atheists, when presented with proof on God they say you are twisting things to suit the Bible.

If you atheists wants proof and facts then do this little search on this CNN website in the archives area and you will see it.

Your statement (as pointed out by other atheist on a different thread, places you in the strong / positive camp, levying a burden of proof on you to substantiate your claim.

AAL: «That's what you atheists are doing all the time, putting the burden of proof on others, the reality is atheists is just a smoke screen and nothing in atheism is good and real, they're even too lazy to do a single research.»