Sentences with phrase «proof points in»

In conclusion, you might throw the term «fast learner» or something similar into your resume's professional summary, but this will only benefit you if you're able to back up this claim with proof points in your work history section.

What's incredibly exciting is that many of these folks now operating these school design labs often point to Oakland's Small Schools Movement as a significant progenitor and proof point in this work and movement.

«This concept goes beyond a flight - of - fancy design exercise; it is the next proof point in Infiniti's concept - to - production approach.

Not exact matches

Though she lost Democratic primaries in Michigan and Wisconsin to Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who ran on a leftist platform, Clinton pointed to some Senate results as proof that she wouldn't have fared better running on a Sanders platform.

These agreements are as much about expanding his footprint as they are proof points for other retailers: If White's shoes are good enough for the toniest retailers in North America, then they're good enough for Selfridges in London, Brown Thomas in Ireland, and so on.

«They became the proof point that you could be involved in an organization that would provide a support centre without cannibalizing the entrepreneurial culture that made the agency successful in the first place.»

As proof, Connolly points to the wave of serendipitous product placements — in ads for Motrin, Mighty Dog, and the U.S. Postal Service, to name a few — that the wheel has received.

Though some experts argue that employee tenures at the top are decreasing, she points to U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics, which find that managers stay with a firm an average of 6.1 years (up from 5.3 years in 1983), as proof that the jury is still out.

Too many of the also - rans are already stuck in the proof - point pudding (moving sideways instead of forward) and finding that they can no longer sell the same old «just wait and see» story as easily to the guys that totally fell for it the last time.

He does say things are going well, pointing to its 85 million users as proof (although that includes subscribers, plus anyone who has downloaded the app, since the company was founded in 2007).

Entrepreneurs in the field say that focusing on the price of Bitcoin is missing the point — its value is as proof of concept for a new kind of payment system not reliant on third parties like governments, big banks or credit - card companies.

and then do the proof that Noah's course (or your product) works... Goal: in my point of view it makes sense, that only those who wan't to become an entrepreneur should click.

It's vital that you have a clear picture of the traction and proof points you'll need to show investors when you eventually do raise your A. And these proof points have to both demonstrate a significant jump in valuation and de-risk your concept.

They showed fortitude as an investor and believed in the eventual opportunity to defend the world from advanced cyber attacks even when there were insufficient market proof points.

The main points of differences in Bitcoin Gold which catch our interest are: the Proof of Work (PoW) algorithm, mining hardware, difficulty adjustment, and replay protection.

While research points to the possibility that the top cybercrime gangs buy webinjections from the same shady developers, more definitive proof was uncovered in one of the most exclusive underground boards via a top - tier injections vendor.

In addition, at some point in the near future, Ethereum will move to a «dividend» (proof of stake) model toIn addition, at some point in the near future, Ethereum will move to a «dividend» (proof of stake) model toin the near future, Ethereum will move to a «dividend» (proof of stake) model too.

Many things are discovered at a point in time, before which time no proof existed.

It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.

But to my point that Atheism is a religion by definition Religion: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith Faith: belief or trust: belief in, devotion to, or trust in somebody or something, especially without proof Atheism: unbelief in God or deities: disbelief in the existence of God or deities

The critical point is, one might say, not so much the proof as the pudding it's in.

As a matter of fact, if you go, I don't know, to a museum, you might find some of the proof of those other histories (outside of the tiny point christianity occupies in thousands of years of human history).

I believe god is love, I think we have little ability to understand much beyond that at this point and those who would define and codify god are arrogant fools doing harm in this world, I believe that the absence of love in anything is proof that it doesn't come from god, fire and brimstone does not come from god, unconditional love and acceptance does.

They point to the priest sex scandals as proof positive that chastity is too much to ask of people — completely ignoring that it was the randy absence of chastity that created the scandals in the first place.

Again, not proof against evolution, but a compelling point to bring in some doubt.

But all varieties of horror flick are easily identifiable at this point, whether they're spooky, low - budget films (numerous); viscera - stained slasher movies (more numerous); quick - cut zombie flicks (even more numerous); macabre sci - fi, floating - in - space efforts (somewhat less numerous than they should be); sexualized vampiric tales (I trip over one of these whenever I get the newspaper); films of the more critically favored retro - mashup variety (Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez's Death Proof plus Planet Terror feature Grindhouse); or foreign entries of the psychological horror variety (the works of Dario Argento, of course; Alexandre Aja's films, which have their defenders; and Juan Antonio Bayona's El Orfanato, which only someone who truly dislikes cinema can dismiss).

Case in point: They believe in ID despite the fact that not one, single piece of evidence has been found in support of it, and not one single experiment has provided any proof for it.

@Delsin: I see your point of view, but until there is absolute solid proof that demons exist, putting your faith in exorcism to cure issues is unwise to say the least.

At one point she made some claim to justify a step in the proof, and the professor quietly asked, «How do we know that?»

Closely connected with this point is another: my sensitivity developed as to the functions of religious language that are not open to definitive proof or falsification, but nevertheless indicate in symbolic form the presence of the ultimate.

The point is when you engage in such blatantly out of context proof texting you have already condemned yourself for any one who tries to enforce any part of the law is bound to all of it.

It's actually a form of proof texting where dozens of passages are ripped out of context in order to prove a theological point.

Perfect case in point about why we should demand proof before we believe.

«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anything.

At least, it tells me that they at least have the mental faculties to understand that numbers, facts, science, and proof aren't on their side, there's no point in disputing it, but there's also no point in trying to change their mind.

The priesthood became hereditary, a separate, professional class, and the sacrifices so increased in number and in the complexity of their attendant rites that one scholar points to the change as «perhaps the most striking and convincing proof of development the Old Testament affords.»

I have yet to see any proof of a god, and most of this nonsense is about their god, so at some point their arguments or lack of them will always have that one huge hole in them.

In referencing Genesis 12:1 - 3, Calvinists often point to Genesis 18:17 - 19 as proof that Abraham was divinely chosen by God because.

If we need proof that we must lay aside our modern view - point in order to understand such a saying in the sense of primitive Christianity, let us consider a very similar parable of the early Christian tradition.

As I am aware that many are promoting a popular view that has been rationalized by whatever means, however you have failed to provide a shred of the emperical proof you claim, and as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive.....

At one point in time, we didn't have proof of many things that ended up being true nonetheless.

You say she has no proof that she has seen angels but do you have proof that she has not see angels and if you have proof that she has not I would love for you to point it out and we believe GOD is real for we walk by faith and not by sight but you say no one has proof that GOD existed but think about this what would lose believing in GOD if he doesn't exist?

- «Based on what he knows at this point, Griffin [Robert Griffin, an ancient Egyptian history scholar at the University of Memphis] said he would hesitate to say the artifacts are definitive proof of the existence of Joseph in Egypt.»

So its ok for him to prove his points (which btw science can not prove something to be real when it comes to THEORIES which is what evolution is, which i believe to be true), yet when someone wants to believe in something that they see points to proof in thats not ok?

In that proof of the existence or non-existence of God in unattainable, at some point in time common sense must be factored into the equatioIn that proof of the existence or non-existence of God in unattainable, at some point in time common sense must be factored into the equatioin unattainable, at some point in time common sense must be factored into the equatioin time common sense must be factored into the equation.

And your «unless you're open to the slightest possibility that you are indeed a space alien born a millisecond ago from another universe, then you are claiming something to be an absolute truth» I think the point was the likelihood — why do you not believe the space alien without proof yet believe in gods and angels without proof?

But other than that, the vast majority of humanity believes in a higher power, so it seems to me the burden of proof would be on the side that is the VAST minority... but once again, the side that is asking the other to change their mind have to prove their point within reason.

Mark puts the story here, in any case, to point to the coming events as decisive proof of the barrenness of the old Israel.

Sentence two is the closest to an actual argument he makes, but it is a fact that science has little to no information on what happens after we die, as you pointed out yourself, we do not know (in the sense of having empirical proof).

Marx points out that the ultimate proof of this assertion is found in the word of Christ himself in the parable of the Vine and Branches.