Avoid off - site injuries by training employees in
proper business liability off - site safety measures.
Not exact matches
The lack of
proper Fort Worth commercial vehicle insurance does not insulate
business owners from the risks associated with injury or damage
liability claims.
With
proper diligence you can limit the total tax
liability of your
business.
Whether it's employment contracts, leases for office space, contractor agreements, meeting minutes, or licensing and release of
liability documents, all
businesses need the
proper documents on record.
A
business owners should always take the
proper steps to minimize risk and
liability.
The forensic accountant provides
business valuation services to assist the court with the
proper division of assets and
liabilities.
Finally, having a
proper contractual relationship can allow covered entities to pass certain parts of HIPAA
liability on to its
business associates including contractors and subcontractors.
He is a frequent speaker and author on the topics of litigation skills and strategy, non-profit governance, insurance coverage for
business liabilities, and the
proper treatment of children as victims and witnesses in court.
Whether you're a carpenter, a photographer, a writer, or some other freelance profession, the
proper liability insurance coverage can be crucial to the survival of your
business.
If you do not have the
proper liability insurance, a single claim could put your company out of
business.
The lack of
proper Fort Worth commercial vehicle insurance does not insulate
business owners from the risks associated with injury or damage
liability claims.
Cutler v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A. (237 A.D. 2d 193)- non-jury trial awarding brokerage commission unanimously affirmed; broker established that she had shown apartment to defendant, he agreed to pay her a brokerage fee, shortly thereafter the broker indicated to him through his
business agent that the apartment was available at his price and he subsequently purchased the apartment through the corporate defendant; joint and several
liability was
proper of the individual and corporate defendant.
887 DOS 03 DOS v. Bravo - deposits; disclosure of agency relationships; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation;
proper business practices; vicarious
liability; broker failed to provide agency disclosure form; broker continued to do
business under prior firm's name after association with that firm had been terminated; broker failed to deposit monies received by her into an escrow account; broker failed to respond to DOS letters; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency by failing to follow up on the availability of an apartment in a rental transaction; broker failed to give a cash refund of a deposit received in cash upon tenant's demand therefore; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by its representative broker; corporate broker's license and representative broker's license suspended for six months
649 DOS 02 DOS v. Holzbach — disclosure of agency relationships;
proper business practices; sanctions; unauthorized practice of law; vicarious
liability; broker fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer although disclosure form could have been faxed to and received from buyer; broker back dated agency disclosure form demonstrating incompetency; use of designated agent form without the use of required agency disclosure form pursuant to RPL § 443 (4); use of «removal of contingency» addendum to contract which did not contain an attorney approval clause and was not on a form jointly approved by the County Bar Association and REALTOR Association constituted the unauthorized practice of law; corporate broker liable for the acts of its representative broker;
proper to impose a higher fine after hearing than that which was offered in settlement (joint fine of $ 2,000.00 offered); associate broker fined $ 2,000.00, representative broker fined $ 1,000.00, and corporate broker fined $ 2,000.00
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing;
proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious
liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of
proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct
business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained
Provided that the LLC has a
proper operating agreement, it is current with its state filings, it has its own accounts, we are not dealing with fraud or gross negligence, and the LLC has been diligent in conducting its activities as a separate and distinct
business it is extremely difficult for the plaintiff to pierce the
liability veil of the LLC and hold the member personally liable for the harm.