Constitutionally speaking (or lawfully speaking) the state is not
a proper party in any case dealing with the liberty of free People.
Not exact matches
Article 5 (b) States
Parties shall take appropriate measure: To ensure that family education includes
proper understanding of maternity as a social function and the recognition of the common responsibility of men and women
in the upbringing of their children, it being understood that the interest of the children is the primordial consideration
in all
cases.
... [T] aking it
in this civil light, the law treats it as it does all other contracts; allowing it to be good and valid
in all
cases, where the
parties at the time of making it were,
in the first place, willing to contract; secondly, able to contract; and, lastly, actually did contract,
in the
proper forms and solemnities required by law.
«If he doesn't resign and mount a
proper leadership challenge -
in which
case we will have a battle within the
party; that is unfortunate but infinitely better than where we are at the moment - but if he doesn't resign then the prime minister should sack him.
The
case for a
proper party conference was eventually made
in the New Statesman by Neal Lawson of Compass.
«The
proper procedure was for a suit to be filed at a court or tribunal which had jurisdiction over the claims of the
parties, and if that court
in the course of determining the
case took the view that the said issue was one of interpretation, that court will refer the issue to the Supreme Court according to article 130 (2) of the 1992 constitution», he added.
Such behaviour by Channel 4
in this
case undermines the
proper working of a political
party, and its accounting regime.»
«The extent to which the court should err towards inclusiveness
in an action inevitably depends on the facts but
in this
case the court finds that Mr Corbyn is a member of the Labour
Party who is particularly affected and particularly interested
in the
proper construction of the rules, and his interest
in that regard is of a significantly different quality than that of other members,» she added.
Also, just
in case anyone was looking for some procedural clarity, we also are told that «a statement of reasons is important,» perhaps especially so if a
party «argues that the Guidelines reflect an unsound judgment, or, for example, that they do not generally treat certain defendant characteristics
in the
proper way.»
The claim had not been compromised as the judge had stated and so the judge had not been bound by BCT Software Solutions Ltd v C Brewer & Sons Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 393, [2003] All ER (D) 196 (Jul)-- where
parties have settled on all issues save costs before a trial or where a trial is incomplete, the court should not, save
in a reasonably obvious
case, embark on making an order for costs because the court will have no
proper basis of agreed or determined facts upon which to base its decision.
In some
cases, we can't determine whether a
party has complied with the obligation to make
proper disclosure of electronic records unless one knows the parameters of the storage system, including the indexing and retrieval routines.
In cases where the organization hosts data with outside vendors, reasonableness and good faith require hold notices to third -
party vendors as well along with
proper steps to ensure preservation of relevant data.
We know the
proper steps that need to be taken
in order to gather the facts and evidence needed to pursue a
case against a liable
party.
They are «taken into account» and may be a significant factor
in a divorce
case to the extent that the English judge feels that it is
proper to do so, depending on the circumstances of the
case.It also means that if a prenuptial agreement is renegotiated and revised after the
parties marry, it will likely be enforced.
It is open to the judge,
in a
proper case, to suggest to the
parties that he be invited to rule on agreed or admitted.
The court's ruling on the
proper interpretation not only resolves the issue for those
parties, but means the law can be correctly applied
in other arbitration
cases.
[106] I conclude that, on a
proper construction of PIPEDA, if the primary activity or conduct at hand,
in this
case the collection of evidence on a plaintiff by an individual defendant
in order to mount a defence to a civil tort action, is not a commercial activity contemplated by PIPEDA, then that activity or conduct remains exempt from PIPEDA even if third
parties are retained by an individual to carry out that activity or conduct on his or her behalf.
The
proper construction of the term
in dispute was vigorously disputed by the
parties throughout the proceeding before the Board; thus, «Intellectual Ventures was on notice that construction of this term was central to the
case.»
This
case is an example of how important it is to identify the
proper parties in your Bangor personal injury
case.
Moylan J concluded that this «division gives
proper weight to all the relevant factors
in the
case, including the contributions each
party has and will make to the welfare of the family and to the fact that a significant part of the wealth has accrued from income earned
in 2008 and 2009 [post separation]».
Courts can not treat the legal custody granted by signing an affidavit of parentage (AOP) the same as a judicial determination custody; therefore, a
party seeking a determination of custody and parenting time, having only signed an AOP, can not be required, as is the
case when modifying an order of custody or parenting time, to show
proper cause of a change
in circumstances.
(c) A collaborative law agreement must include provisions for: (1) full and candid exchange of information between the
parties and their attorneys as necessary to make a
proper evaluation of the
case; (2) suspending court intervention
in the dispute while the
parties are using collaborative law procedures; (3) hiring experts, as jointly agreed, to be used
in the procedure; (4) withdrawal of all counsel involved
in the collaborative law procedure if the collaborative law procedure does not result
in settlement of the dispute; and (5) other provisions as agreed to by the
parties consistent with a good faith effort to collaboratively settle the matter.