Not exact matches
To this day, the
proper mixture
of dismal
science and effervescent humanity is the
subject of heated debate, not to metion a number
of best - selling books.
Most
of what is known
of human nature from mathematics and the physical
sciences is based on reflection on those disciplines and hence is not normally thought to be part
of their
proper subject matter, but to belong more to the philosophy
of science and mathematics.
Wieman was quite aware
of the charges that these latter disciplines, and certainly the religious arena, were not and never could be
proper subjects for
science.
Religious phenomenology and history are not two
sciences but are two complementary aspects
of the integral
science of religion, and the
science of religion as such has a well - defined character given to it by its unique and
proper subject matter.
When he's finished doing that, perhaps he could also explain it to the shade
of Richard Feynman, who had some rather famous words to say on the
subject of proper science...