Sentences with phrase «properaganda by big oil»

The convenience landscape in the United States today looks like Canada's did back in 1990: dotted with regional chains numbering between 50 and 300 stores, some larger networks owned by Big Oil, and industry leader 7 - Eleven.

I think we deserve to win the PL and UCL every other year (every year would just be greedy), we just need to get bought out by big oil money, sack the board, build another 2 tiers on the Emirates to get us up to 85,000 capacity, sack Wenger and appoint Klopp / Simone / Koeman (whoever is doing best at the time), sell the entire squad and start again but 25 world class players and nothing less.

They are doing that because it is obvious to the rest of the world (if not to Republican politicians who've been bought by Big Oil) that this is the practical way to go, and they are playing the long game.

His nomination will be greeted with dismay by climate activists and environmentalists who will see it as tantamount to a takeover of US foreign policy by Big Oil.

These findings are not surprising when the amount of money put down directly by Big Oil is taken in to account.

Plots by big oil, Bill Gates & nuke scientists.

Now the Alaska Wilderness League has sifted the financial backers for Mr. Gingrich's campaign and released a list of donors that it says shows Mr. Gingrich's push for drilling is «funded by Big Oil, for Big Oil.»

That it will not be squelched by Big Oil, Big Business or the other Bigs in what used to be our Country

Of course people will say that these studies must be funded by big oil and then dismiss them.

America is controled by big oil.

But I'm sure there's a conspiracy to discredit honest psychologists who are just trying to make a crust, and I'm sure it's funded by Big Oil, Big Tobacco, and Big Macs.

From The Guardian: «The connection to the chemical firm Solvay suggests opposition to action on global warming, once spearheaded by big oil, is spreading to other industries that will also be affected by proposals to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases.»

In this case, such idealistic IPCC policy recommendations will never happen because our governments are so corrupted by Big Oil.

Have they all been bought by big oil?

And I do not believe it discredits them as I plainly said about what it would mean if they were supported directly by big oil.

«The State Department's review, written by Big Oil's cronies, presents a fatalistic view of a future devastated by extreme and catastrophic climate change.

It is frequently alleged that climate skeptics are being funded by big oil — and that their views should therefore not be trusted.

While the other side were treated as thought they were the exact opposite: only motivated by reactionary political beliefs, bought by big oil, not scientists in any sense of the word and you had to ignore every last thing they ever said because they were evil.

I get annoyed at the suggestion that public skepticism of AGW exists largely because of the manufactured doubt by big oil and others with vested interests.

Note that I don't accept that even if you were to uncover SM was lavishly funded by Big Oil behind the scenes it would make a blind bit of difference to the analyses, but the question is one of the sizzle and not real bacon.

Le Monde, one of the leading (and predictably leftist) French daily didn't say a word about Climategate for weeks only to dismiss it as a conspiracy to derail Copenhagen by Russian or whatever hackers paid by big oil to steal private correspondance between honnest and hard - working climate scientists (translation, nothing to see here).

Get ready for assertions that the NIPCC study was paid for by big oil, the coal industry, or power companies (it wasn't), or that the people who wrote the study aren't scientists (but they are).

Or lies like «Heartland Institute is hugely funded by big oil»?

Those on the other side may say there is no problem, that they are the enlightened few saving the planet from the evil skeptics funded by big oil, but we can always hope that over time some new standards will develop.

The Greenpeace report, «Dr. Willie Soon: a Career Fueled by Big Oil and Coal,» reveals that $ 1.033 million of Dr. Soon's funding since 2001 has come from oil and coal interests.

but of course you'll listen to «experts» such as washed - up weathermen, hack UK politicians, and «scientists» bought and paid for by Big Oil.

«Deniers» are funded by Big Oil.

Doesn't fit the AGW message pounded into pliable brains... most the MSM are cheerleaders for the warmists and a troubling percentage of them are forgetting the message change to well, climate change vs the old too narrow warming schtick... of course we know that the sun's solar minimum is caused by big oil.

So even if by miracle a sceptical scientist would be financed by Big Oil (it is unfortunately impossible), it would be certainly a positive action that would restore a balance in a world where not only Big Oil but mad people like Soros an other billionaires pour money in environmentalism.

Enstrom was featured in the documentary, Merchants of Doubt, that compares the denial of the health risks of smoking by Big Tobacco to the denial of climate change by Big Oil.

I'm not one who believes skeptics are «funded by Big Oil,» which seems cartoonishly reductive to me.

Anyone who disagres with the above statements is being paid by big oil - end of topic.

All others are clowns and fools, or paid for by Big Oil.

And you would have to be pretty obstinate to try and poke holes in peer - reviewed climate science given that McIntyre claims he does not receive a salary signed by Big Oil.

More properaganda by big oil and big coal paid by there billion of dollars in profits, you know the call drill baby drill or is it spill baby spill.

CRU is still financed by big oil and nuclear and it is from CRU's outset that world temperature records began to be manipulated, see Salinger / New Zealand.

I commented, pointing out that the MIT Joint Program is financed by Shell, BP, and Exxon, among others, and asking what the Guardian was doing publicising propaganda financed by Big Oil.

Both the BBC and the Huffington Post have decided to write off the expertise of the dozens of PhDs and professors speaking at this event to concentrate on the issue that really matters: it was funded by Big Oil.

Sceptics remark yet another year of «absence of warming» since they are paid by big oil conspirators and DIRTY coal.

These same people are quite sure that the reason we don't have machines capable of giving free energy forever is due to «poor engineering», or its a conspiracy by Big Oil or Big Gubmint to fleece us all.

For all of the accusations of skeptical elements being primarily driven by big oil or other corporate entities, the evidence supporting this hypothesis is relatively thin.

Once again, it was not climate - change deniers and secret PR campaigns funded by Big Oil companies that caused the failure.

This site is such a transparent attempt by the big oil industry to dissuade us from making their toxic product obsolete.

Some of the authors in AR4 were paid for their effort by Big Oil, others were paid by Big Environment, most were on public money working for an interested department, but I've never met anyone who worked for the IPCC on a grant of the National Science Foundation or suchlike.

Or do we let the forces of obstruction — led by Big Oil and special - interest polluters — win, ensuring America's continued addiction to the dirty, unsafe energy of the 19th century?

Also: Thanks to Fakegate, everyone now knows that the «center of climate change denial» (NYT Feb 21, 2012) is not financed by Big Oil.

I haven't spent years alleging that every second climate blogger is part of a «well - funded disinformation campaign» bankrolled by big oil.

* I been duped by big oil and / or right wing think tanks * I have opened my mind so wide to skeptics that my brains have fallen out * I'm in the pay of big oil or right wing think tanks * I'm being blackmailed * I have become either physically or mentally disabled

I do not deny that the climate changes and I am not funded by Big Oil — or, sadly, anyone else to express my opinion on these matters.

It used to be the narrative of the formerly mainstream media, when they deemed it worthy to include perspective from the «skeptic» side, always came with a «financed by Big Oil» disclaimer — whether it was true or not.