Anybody with an education in the sciences can tell when a credentialed charlatan is violating scientific method, «cherry - picking» data, manipulating computer simulations (climate models) to «draw the curve, then plot the points,» concealing his raw observational data sets from
properly skeptical examiners, corrupting academic peer review (both to suppress the publication of colleagues» studies casting doubt upon the reviewing officers» pet hypotheses and to ensure that the submissions of «The Team» do not suffer impediments to publication), and concerting all these violations of professional
ethical standards by
way of back - room confabs and some of the most incredibly stupid e-mails this side of Enron's «Smartest Guys in the Room.»
The term «
ethical infrastructure» (coined by Ted Schneyer, a law professor at the University of Arizona) is just a fancy
way of talking about the systems, procedures and policies that a law firm has in place to ensure that lawyers
properly discharge their
ethical duties.
Apply the NCCP
Ethical Decision - Making Model to
properly respond to each situation in a
way that is consistent with the NCCP Code of Ethics.