A number of studies have linked mesothelioma to background factors including radiation treatments, other materials with similar
properties as asbestos and even a particular gene.
Not exact matches
Government action is portrayed
as theft of the rights of fossil fuel - rich
property holders, but is their situation any different from
asbestos - containing
property holders?
The Panel determined that Canada had failed to meet its burden of proof with respect to its legitimate expectations
as medical evidence regarding the carcinogenic
properties of
asbestos was extensive by that time of the Uruguay negotiations and Canada should have foreseen future acts to ban
asbestos products.
We routinely represent multiple industrial clients in the defense of proposed class actions seeking
property damages and / or personal injuries
as a result of exposure to contamination or hazardous products (
asbestos, PCB's, etc.).
As outlined below, we excel in representing individual victims of asbestos disease and their families as well as the owners of asbestos - contaminated propertie
As outlined below, we excel in representing individual victims of
asbestos disease and their families
as well as the owners of asbestos - contaminated propertie
as well
as the owners of asbestos - contaminated propertie
as the owners of
asbestos - contaminated
properties.
In denying summary judgment to GE and granting summary judgment to Boston Edison, the Court found that: (1) while the construction work performed by GE met the definition of an improvement to real
property for purposes of the statute of repose, public policy considerations necessitated an exception to the application of the statute in cases involving alleged
asbestos - related disease; (2) the installation of
asbestos insulation was not an abnormally dangerous activity; (3) Boston Edison did not exercise sufficient control over the work at issue to be held negligent; and (4) a premises owner, such
as Boston Edison, has no duty to warn where the subcontractor has knowledge of the hazard which is equal to or greater than that of the premises owner.
After a second summary judgment attempt, the court dismissed Gill's contractor negligence claim, holding that installation or removal of
asbestos - containing products constitutes an «improvement to real
property»
as defined in the construction statute of repose (CSoR).
The contract stated that the Buyers could terminate the agreement and receive a refund of their deposit if an inspection revealed the presence of specified environmental conditions on the
property, such
as asbestos or toxic substances, unless the Sellers agreed in writing to repair the condition at their own expense.