He also follows up his look at
the property infringement issues of the first game and how it relates to the higher - than - average price tag for this game:
Not exact matches
Sony
issued a formal statement today on the matter of user - created levels being deleted from LittleBigPlanet, saying the «vast majority of content uploaded to date has been fun and suitable for all of our community members,» but that «In a very few cases we have upheld complaints regarding unsuitable content or
infringement of intellectual
property, with less than 0.5 % of levels actively moderated as a result of complaints from other users.»
Whether you believe that non-compete agreements are an
infringement on innovators» personal liberties or a legitimate way for innovative companies to protect their intellectual
property rights, you'll want to hear what Attorney Michael L. Rosen, a Partner at the firm of Foley Hoag LLP says about this contentious
issue.
He assists clients in all aspects of intellectual
property law, including patent and trademark prosecution,
infringement analysis, domain name cybersquatting
issues, and all forms of intellectual
property licensing.
Any other recent
issues in intellectual
property infringement damages that you have seen developing?
When
issues are disputed, our intellectual
property specialists will help using their extensive knowledge of settling domain name, breach of contract,
infringement and negligence claims.
His experience includes
issues in relation to «retrospective» time limits, alleged
infringements of the right to
property, requirements to pay tax demands before tribunal proceedings can be commenced, and matters relating to the right to a fair hearing, including standovers pending criminal proceedings and the initial challenges to the independence of VAT & Duties tribunal under Article 6.
Injunctions have been sought and
issued in wide - ranging circumstances, including in
property litigation, commercial actions, IP
infringement proceedings, labour disputes, and in cases of public proteses.
The kinds of representation we provide involve: (1) litigation and appeals regarding a wide variety of legal
issues; (2) employment disputes, including discrimination claims and accusations of noncompliance with wage and hour laws; (3) intellectual
property matters regarding patents, trademarks and copyright
infringements; (4) commercial real estate matters; (5) business law disputes; and (6) alternative dispute resolution («ADR») matters, including mediation and arbitration cases.
Mr. Burt also has substantial experience litigating intellectual
property issues including trademark and copyright
infringement and trade dress violations.
They focus routinely on coverage
issues, including advertising injury, personal injury liability, errors and omissions, director's and officer's, named peril and all - risk
property, hospital / medical / HMO / PPO, educator's liability, securities / broker, employment practices liability, intellectual
property and patent
infringement, sexual abuse / harassment
issues, environmental / toxic tort, primary / excess disputes, and reinsurance contract obligations.
Her practice also includes patentability investigations,
infringement and right - to - use analysis, and intellectual
property transactions and licensing agreements, trademark, trade dress, and copyright
issues.
Bob's experience includes counseling and drafting opinions for clients on validity and
infringement issues concerning patent
property and advising clients on new product development, including providing clearance searches and opinions on the right to use such products and providing designing around advice to avoid patent
infringement.
However, his specialism is in Intellectual
Property issues such as copyright and trade mark
infringements and domain name disputes.
KG v. CAE Machinery Ltd. (1995), 62 C.P.R. (3d) 26 (F.C.T.D.) that «I am also of the opinion that, in general, summary judgment is not the proper means to obtain judgment where the
issues before the court involve the
infringement or the invalidity of a patent», most contested intellectual
property decisions in the Federal Court on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participating.
Courage notes that the Canadian Intellectual
Property Office is still
issuing patents on genes and there was one enforced in Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser — in which a party was found guilty of
infringement.
Infringement may understandably be characterized as a «generic specific»
issue if it relates to
properties of the generic product, as opposed to «patent specific»
issues which would likely be equally applicable irrespective of the generic respondent.
Kathleen's intellectual
property practice is comprehensive, and encompasses contract and license negotiation, arbitration and mediation, due diligence,
infringement and validity opinions, patent term extension, indemnity
issues, research «safe harbor»
issues, and biologics / biosimilars.
There are also
issues related to appropriate use of advertising and intellectual
property infringement (for instance, do your agents know how to source photos).
Local (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and International Intellectual and
Property Copyright from 1996 — 2016 — First Published by A. Mark Argentino on Tuesday, July 16th, 1996 Read more about copyright
infringement and privacy
issues