Sentences with phrase «property owners liable»

The legal theory of premises liability holds property owners liable for any accident or injury which occurs on the property.

At Zinda Law Group, our team of attorneys has the experience and resources necessary to hold property owners liable when visitors are injured.

A slip or trip and fall claim is based upon the concept of premises liability, which holds property owners liable if they fail in their duty to keep you safe from hazardous conditions.

Our attorneys understand North Carolina premises liability law and know how to find applicable insurance coverage to compensate you for your injuries and how to hold negligent property owners liable.

Negligent security is an area of premises liability that deals with holding property owners liable for any damages or injuries held on their property due to a lack of reasonable security.

To prove a property owner liable for your injuries, you must present evidence showing that either an employee or the owner himself:

Gross negligence is required to hold a property owner liable.

Additionally, setting a trap specifically designed to harm trespassers without warning could make the property owner liable for damages.

Any injuries or deaths which occur would render the property owner liable.

Failure to do so could be viewed as negligence in the eyes of the law and may make the property owner liable if someone gets hurt.

Failing to do so constitutes a breach of the property owner's duty of care, and may make the property owner liable for negligence.

Not exact matches

This charge is payable annually in respect of all real estate properties in the State, which means owners and occupiers holding a lease to a Property for ten (10) years or more are now liable to pay the annual LUC invoice charged.

Will I be liable, as a home owner and landlord, for a charge if I buy another property before selling the one I live in?

One notable example is the Scaffold Law, an 1885 law that makes property owners and contractors liable for any «gravity - related» injuries at construction sites.

Alliance executive director Tom Stebbins said trial lawyers have profited handsomely while driving up the cost of doing business in New York by blocking needed reforms to provisions such as the «scaffold law,» which holds contractors and property owners fully liable no matter what if workers are hurt in falls from heights under unsafe conditions.

«This is important because the owner of the property may not be liable for everything that happens on his or her property.

You are not liable for the deficiency if your lender is a financial institution, the loan originated after October 1, 2009, the property is a single - family owner - occupied home, the mortgage debt was used to purchase the property, and you haven't refinanced the mortgage.

You understand that to the extent permitted under applicable law, in no event will PROPERTY INVESTMENT SINGAPORE BLOG's owners, affiliated partners, agents, licensors be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary damages, including but not limited to, damages for loss of revenues, profits, goodwill, use, data or other intangible losses (even if such parties were advised or, knew of or should have known of the possibility of such damages), resulting from your use of this website and / or services.

Owners will be solely liable for any injury or property damage that results from their pet's behavior.

Dog owners are liable for all damages caused by their pets, including property damage and personal liability.

If a dog damages another person's property and frightens or injures the humans, the loose - dog's owners are liable for court settlements and they rarely win.

Lawsuit update: PETA tells the Court that Maya was worthless and therefore they can't be financially liable to the family, that, at best, the dog had no value beyond the cost of replacement for another dog, they had permission by the property owner to remove community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering and killing a dog, and the family is not entitled to punitive damages because PETA's theft and immediate killing of a happy, healthy, beloved dog is not «outrageous» conduct.

PETA, however, told the court that they can not be held liable for trespass because the property owner gave them permission to come into the trailer park and onto the property and round up community cats (who they would also kill that day).

The City Council found that owners who allow their dangerous dogs to run loose in the city or fail to safely and humanely restrain those dogs on their property are criminally and civilly liable for the harm those dogs cause.

Owners will be solely liable and held responsible for any injury or property damage that results from their pet's behavior.

Under no circumstances will the sites or the Chopra parties be liable to you for any loss or damages of any kind that are directly or indirectly related to the sites, the materials in the sites, the downloadable items, user content, your use or inability to use, or the performance of the sites, any action taken in connection with an investigation by the sites or law enforcement authorities regarding your use of the sites, and action taken in connection with copyright or other intellectual property owners, any errors or omission in the sites, technical operation, or any damage to any users computer, hardware, software, wireless devices, cellular phone, modem or other equipment or technology, including without limitation damage from any security breach or from any virus, bugs, tampering, fraud, scam, error, omission, interruption, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer line or network failure or any other technical or other malfunction, even if foreseeable or even if the sites or Chopra parties have been advised of or should have known of the possibility of such damages, whether in an action of contract, negligence, strict liability or tort.

Accordingly, a variety of consequential injuries were held not to constitute takings... Nor was government held liable for the extra expense which the property owner must obligate in order to ward off the consequence of the governmental action... But the Court also decided long ago that land can be «taken» in the constitutional sense by physical invasion or occupation by the government, as occurs when the government floods land permanently or recurrently.

If something does happen to a trespasser while trying to catch a Pokemon on private property, the property owner would likely continue to be strictly liable to a trespasser for an injuries that occurred, but it also seems likely that they would have a right to seek indemnification (where one party bears the monetary costs, either directly or by reimbursement, for losses incurred by a second party) from Nintendo and Niantic.

Common circumstances in which property owners are found legally liable for the injuries of their guests include the following:

It is important to understand that if a person slips, trips or falls as a result of a dangerous condition, the property owner could be held liable for any injuries.

The basic rule is that a land owner will be liable to an injured guest in many situations, but it depends on the reason plaintiff was on the property at the time of the accident.

In Florida, if you get injured on someone else's property, whether it is a private home or a business frequented by the general public, the law that controls whether the property owner is liable is known as premises liability law.

Indeed, many parties, including business owners, landlords, and property management companies, may be liable for failing to provide adequate protection under certain circumstances.

Premises liability outlines that if a visitor sustains an injury on a property, the property owner is liable if they did not take reasonable safety precautions.

Premises liability in Kentucky is based on the principle that a property owner may be liable for injuries to visitors if they are found to be negligent.

Depending on the unique circumstances of the case, the liable parties may include the establishment where the crime occurred, property owners, security companies and / or government entities, in addition to the offender.

Property owners may be held liable for injuries that occur on a property owner's premises under the law of premises liProperty owners may be held liable for injuries that occur on a property owner's premises under the law of premises liproperty owner's premises under the law of premises liability.

Private property owners of local seaside shops, grocery stores, restaurants, bars, other places of business, and private homes may all be held liable for your injury.

Under the attractive nuisance doctrine, property owners can sometimes be held liable for a child trespasser's injuries in a premises liability lawsuit.

If you were on the premises for the purposes of conducting business or as a social guest, the property owner has a duty to keep the property reasonable safe and will be liable if you suffer serious bodily injury.

In some situations, moreover, a property owner like an apartment complex, a shopping center, or an office building may be held liable when its failure to provide adequate safety results in crimes by third parties.

If you received an injury on a property not belonging to you, the property owner may be liable.

If somebody slips and falls because a building has been poorly maintained, the property owner could be liable for their injuries.

Hotel, motel, and short - term property owner can be liable for bed bug injuries if they knew, or should have known, about a bed bug problem but failed to fix the situation.

California's Civil Code Section 3342 states: «The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, regard n less of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner's knowledge of such viciousness.»

Below, you'll find out which slip and fall injuries you should look out for and when property owners and municipalities are liable.

Property owners who were once held liable for damages may now point to contractors and subcontractors to confuse the issue of exactly who is liable for your injuries.

If you've been injured in a slip and fall accident, you probably want to know whether the property owner is liable for your injuries.

If the slip and fall was a direct result of dangerous conditions that the property owner failed to fix, they could be held liable for your damage.

Often times, the owner of the property where the fall happened is legally liable for the injuries.