Sentences with phrase «property owners owe»

Customers in grocery stores, malls, restaurants or other public places are considered invitees, and property owners owe invitees the highest level of care.

In California, property owners owe a duty of care to keep their properties in reasonably safe conditions for people who might come onto them.

Depending upon the type of premises and the extent to which they have invited or allowed people on the premises, property owners owe different levels of responsibility.

Property owners owe an especially high duty of care to visitors who are on the property for reasons that financially benefit the property owner, such as shopping or dining.

Unlike many states, which define a landowner's duty of care based on the status of the plaintiff — business invitee, guest, trespasser, etc. — Maine premises liability law provides that all property owners owe a duty of reasonable care to lawful guests.

Residential and commercial property owners owe a duty to keep their properties safe.

Additionally, property owners owe a different duty of care to different people, depending on why they are on the premises.

Property owners owe a high duty of care to invitees.

These theory opines that property owners owe varying degrees of duty to protect lawful visitors (and sometimes even lawful visitors) from unreasonable risk of harm.

Property owners owe business invitees the highest duty of care to make sure the site is free of unreasonable hazards.

In order to prove that you have a premises liability claim, you first need to establish that the property owner owed you a duty of care.

In order to prove that you have a premises liability case, you will first need to establish that the property owner owed you a duty of care.

This court abolished, in premises liability actions involving a slip and fall on snow and ice, the distinction between natural and unnatural accumulations of snow and ice, which had constituted an exception to the general rule of premises liability that a property owner owes a duty to all lawful visitors to use reasonable care to maintain its property in a reasonably safe condition in view of all the circumstances [370 - 384]; further, this court saw no reason to limit its holding to prospective application [384 - 386].

Florida law recognizes three types of premises liability claims, which outline the level of responsibility a property owner owes the visitor:

The property owner owes the smallest duty of care to trespassers who harm themselves on the property.

In order to establish a premises liability case, you will need to prove that the property owner owed you a duty of care, that the property owner breached that duty by leaving his property unreasonably dangerous, and that you suffered an injury as a result.

How to prove that the property owner owed you a duty of care depends on the circumstances surrounding your presence on the property.

OK, first you will probably have to find out how much exactly does the property owner owes.

Not exact matches

Now, the district owes more than $ 5 million in back taxes to municipalities and school districts around the Sacandaga, where it still collects annual access fees from property owners.

She said most of those properties are owner - occupied and owe less than what the property is worth.

As of August, more than 3,000 property owners in the city owed nearly $ 1.8 million in property taxes to Erie County through 2015 even though they had paid city property taxes, according to a Buffalo News analysis.

The Rockland County owner has stayed relatively current with city property taxes and continues to collect rent from tenants, but Elmwood Heights LLC owes the county four years of back taxes and interest — more than $ 29,000, the highest outstanding county tax debt found in The News analysis.

QUEENS, NY — Borough President Melinda Katz today announced an upcoming workshop at Queens Borough Hall to help homeowners and other property owners who may be affected by the City's upcoming tax lien sale due to unpaid taxes and other bills owed to the City of New York.

A short sale is when a mortgage lender allows an owner to sell property for less than what's owed on the mortgage.

During that time, the prior owner could pay off the debts owed on the house and reclaim full - ownership of the property.

For instance, if the owner owes $ 60,000 in income tax, and the Canada Revenue Agency was successful in putting a lien on the home, then the purchase of the property will mean you are now responsible for paying that $ 60,000 CRA debt.

By the end of the second quarter, more than 12.3 million homes were equity rich — meaning their owners owed less than 50 percent of the property's value on outstanding mortgages — according to real... View Article

Alternatively, some lenders may agree to short selling properties, meaning lenders accept less money than borrowers owe them to allow current owners to sell to new owners who can afford payments.

A short sale is when a bank will accept an offer on a house that is less than what the current owner owes on the property.

Power of Sale is an arrangement in which the owner is allowed to sell the property in order to make back the money that is owed to the lender.

A lien indicates that the owner may owe back taxes on the property.

Before you buy, do an ownership check for as little as $ 3.40 using the Australian Government's Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) to make sure the car won't be repossessed because the owner still owes money on it.

A short sale is essentially what happens when a home is sold for less than the amount of money that remains on the mortgage because the owner owes more on the mortgage then what the property is worth.

[Disambiguation: A short sale in the stock market is not related to the real estate concept of a short sale, which is when a property owner sells his property for less than he owes the bank.]

Also do an ownership check for as little as $ 3.40 using the Australian Government Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) to make sure the car won't be repossessed if the owner still owes money on it.

If that property becomes damaged, lost or stolen then the pawn shop will owe damages to the owner.

Property owners in Tennessee owe a duty of care to ensure that their premises are safe and free from hazards.

When property owners fail to fulfill the duty of care owed to people visiting their property — especially those invited onto the property — they may be held liable for harm caused by the hazardous condition.

[46] What is clear, however, based on s. 2 of the Act, is that there is no general common law duty of care, based on proximity principles, owed by an adjacent property owner or tenant in respect of sidewalks that abut that person's property.

Depending on the role of the guest (i.e., a social visitor, a business invitee or a trespasser), the duty of care owed by the property owner will vary.

Lawsuits claiming injuries as a result of some unsafe condition are dependent on determining what duty, if any, the property owner or occupier owed the injured individual.

Premises liability refers to the duty owed by the property owner to the visitor.

The owners of property, for example, owe a duty to exercise varying levels of care to persons who have come onto their premises.

Social guests are owed a slightly lower duty of care, but property owners still must protect them from any known dangerous conditions, either by repairing a hazard or by providing a warning.

The Savannah premises liability lawyers at Harris Lowry Manton LLP understand the duties that owners of public and private property owe to people who use their property.

Property owners are responsible for maintaining safe conditions and may owe a legal duty to individuals who have been injured through a premises liability claim.

In order to satisfy the reasonableness standard owed to invitees and licensees, an owner has a continuing duty to inspect the property, identify dangerous conditions, and either repair them or post warnings as appropriate.

Premises liability claims can be tricky because a person making a claim must consider both the kind of duty the owner of the property owed the injured person, and the circumstances surrounding the injury.

Footnote 17 of the Papadopoulos case notes that perhaps should be the case that, «in the absence of unusual circumstances, a property owner, in fulfilling the duty owed to invitees upon his property to exercise reasonable diligence in removing dangerous accumulations of snow and ice, may await the end of a storm and a reasonable time thereafter before removing ice and snow from outside walks and steps.»

Therefore, while an owner of a single - family home, an apartment house owner, a store owner and a nursing home operator each owe lawful visitors to their property a duty of reasonable care, what constitutes reasonable snow removal may vary among them.»