Not exact matches
In the not - so - distant past, if a person came up with a
concept for a new product and wanted to try to monetize their idea, the only options available were to either start a company to produce and sell the product or to secure intellectual
property rights and attempt to license the idea to an already - established company.
Intellectual
property law should protect the
rights of those who act on ideas to their finished product, rewarding those who have turned a
concept into a tangible and useful creation.
In the medieval period, God's absolute dominion was expressed in the
concept of private
property as the
right to create and destroy — to use and abuse — the fruits of the earth.
Thus Parliament, during passage of the Reform Bill, responded to aspects of the
concepts «constitution,» «aristocracy,» «democracy,» «
property rights,» and so on.
The
concept of freedom is tied up with the
right to accumulate
property, these two
rights individual freedom and
right to
property is said to have better maintained only in a market society.
First of all, «ownership» is not the
right concept, which applies to private
property.
Classical liberals oppose these policies for a variety of reasons, most notably because it violates the
concepts of
property rights and free exchange.
Due process of law is a legal
concept that ensures the government will respect all of a person's legal
rights instead of just some or most of those legal
rights when the government deprives a person of life, liberty, or
property.
7.7 All comments, suggestions, ideas, notes, drawings or
concepts in which intellectual
property rights subsist which are disclosed or offered to ELITESINGLES by you or offered in response to solicitations by ELITESINGLES regarding the website (Ideas) shall be deemed to be and shall remain the
property ELITESINGLES and you hereby assign all existing present and future intellectual
property rights in Ideas, to ELITESINGLES.
20.6 All comments, suggestions, ideas, notes, drawings or
concepts in which intellectual
property rights subsist which are disclosed or offered to the Company by you or offered in response to solicitations by the Company regarding our Services (Ideas) shall be deemed to be and shall remain the
property the Company and you hereby assign all existing present and future intellectual
property rights in Ideas, to the Company.
Those two things are nowhere to be found in Ted 2, despite the oddly topical storyline centered around the
concept of Ted (MacFarlane) and John (Wahlberg) fighting for the bear's civil
rights when it turns out that he somehow slipped by the legal system all these years and is now suddenly deemed
property in the eyes of the law, as opposed to a human being.
An amount received for the transfer of a
right to an income stream severed from the
property to which it relates is income according to ordinary
concepts.
Thus, an amount received for the transfer of a
right to an income stream severed from the
property to which it relates is income according to ordinary
concepts.
Based on the stated desire by some groups to eliminate pet ownership, it replaces
property rights in animals with «guardianship,» a
concept that allows government authorities and appointed agents to confiscate dogs without compensation.
The Privilege Floor @Lotus Blanc is located on the first floor of a premier and luxury boutique hotel of Lotus Blanc Resort set
right in the center of the historical town of Siem Reap.With only 10 minutes away from Siem Reap International Airport and 15 minutes to the world renowned heritage site of Angkor Wat, this
property consists of 23 privilege rooms and suites delivering a unique experience of Cambodian hotel personalized service
concept with the premises featuring a sophisticated type of elegance inspired by the French art and decor.The location is also close to Siem Reap Pub Street, Angkor Night Market, and other city attractions with only 5 minutes ride by Cambodian remorque (tuk - tuk).
Always stretching the
concepts of intellectual
property rights, Prince has also appropriated images from people's private Instagram accounts.
Interestingly, there existed a very strong
concept of
property rights, very similar to Western European capitalist tradition.
Property law has a fundamental
concept of a «corporeal hereditament» (i.e. land, which has substance) and an incorporeal hereditament (an intangible
right in land).
It presages a law captured by the rhetoric of the
right to freedom of expression without due regard to the value underlying the particular exercise of that
right; a law in which, under the guise of the
right to freedom of expression, the «
right» to offend can be exercised without responsibility or restraint providing it does not cause a disruption or disturbance in the nature of public disorder; a law in which an impoverished amoral
concept of «public order» is judicially ordained; a law in which the
right to freedom of expression trumps — or tramples upon — other
rights and values which are the vital
rights and
properties of a free and democratic society; a law to which any number of vulnerable individuals and minorities may be exposed to uncivil, and even odious, ethnic, sexist, homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic taunts providing no public disorder results; a law in which good and decent people can be used as fodder to promote a cause or promote an action for which they are not responsible and over which they have no direct control; a law which demeans the dignity of the persons adversely affected by those asserting their
right to freedom of expression in a disorderly or offensive manner; a law in which the mores or standards of society are set without regard to the reasonable expectations of citizens in a free and democratic society; and a law marked by a lack of empathy by the sensibilities, feelings and emotional frailties of people who can be deeply and genuinely affronted by language and behaviour that is beyond the pale in a civil and civilised society.
This should include expanding the rules of proof for Aboriginal
rights and title to more appropriately recognize Indigenous legal
concepts of
property, resource use and management.
This vague patent attempts to claim the intellectual
property rights of any system which monitors preexisting data streams connected to a server, a
concept which could be applied to limitless services and systems in use today.
The president further added that «We believe that MME's BCP
concept (digital information containing elements of a
property right) is an important contribution to this debate.
«What has emerged from the High Court is a
concept of recognition as not simply the law providing a vehicle for Indigenous people to enjoy their culture and
property rights,» said Dr Jonas.
There is no doubt that the recognition of native title as a domestic law
concept on which Indigenous
property rights were founded is inextricably linked to the overturning of terra nullius as an international law
concept on which Australia's sovereignty was founded.
Implicit in the statute is the
concept that one party's
rights to marital
property owned by the other party do not vest until a divorce decree is entered and the court has distributed the marital
property.»
To this day, however, laws governing
property rights during marriage retain outmoded and archaic common law
concepts about ownership, possession, and control of marital
property that discriminate against women.
Emerging from the High Court is a
concept of recognition as not simply the law providing a vehicle for Indigenous people to enjoy their cultural and
property rights, but rather one where the law becomes a barrier to their enjoyment and protection.
Having recognised that Aboriginal connection to country might be different to a
property right to control the land, reflecting a deeper spiritual relationship with the land, the Court promptly explains how the core
concepts of a
right to be asked permission and to speak for country are rightly expressed in common law terms as
rights to possess, occupy, use and enjoy the land to the exclusion of all others.
Emerging from the High Court decisions in Yarmirr, Miriuwung Gajerrong and Yorta Yorta, is a
concept of recognition as not simply the law providing a vehicle for Indigenous people to enjoy their culture and
property rights, but rather one where the law becomes a barrier to their enjoyment and protection.
After finding approximate common law equivalents for these core
concepts of traditional law and custom (and denying some interests for which no equivalent can be found) the Court then determines the extent to which the creation of
rights to control access to land under the non-Indigenous
property system would extinguish them.
The key
concept for listing agents to remember is that their client, the seller, has the
right to negotiate the sale of his or her
property in any manner that's legal under state law.
Do your opinions all henge on the
concept that the contract is some form of listing agreement and that instead of selling the
rights to buy a
property at a predetermined price they are just bringing a buyer and seller together for a commission.
However, I think there is a key principle that needs to be addressed regarding the basic
concept (DDF) and that is how do we maintain the
rights of seller clients to decide whether they want a brokerage other than their listing brokerage to essentially advertise their
property?